The violent hatred of Shockadelic towards non white people is there for all to see in his above post.

He's part of a radical, tiny minority culture of mostly old men and skinheads in Australia who fear and hate cultures that are not "white". It's a trip back to pre WW2 Australia. Racists like Shockadelic happily exist in a long bygone era. They are old fashioned, old and in the way. Look at the post by Chrisgaff1000 .. he shows he's more than happy to murder his hated "darkies" with guns, in order to preserve his "white" Australia.

Nhoj,
You're either a 15 year old boy or a 65 year old woman, it's hard to tell which.

<<Now take a seat before you read the next line I’d hate to be responsible for you injuring yourself –when you faint in disbelief & horror]
IT EVEN EXISTS IN NON-WHITE COMMUNITIES/GROUP!>>

SPQR, When have I ever claimed racism is purely a white mans disease. What fosters racism is often unrealistic fears brought on by ignorance, which in turn is a product of a poor education, which resulted in lack of opportunity and social disadvantage. A well educated person might be a racists for opportunistic reason, using racism as a vehicle to further their own ambitions, or simply to exploit a particular group.
It is difficult say, for a poor white person to lash out at other poor whites who are in competition with him for jobs, housing, etc, they are to much alike, so he can't find a discernible difference to justify aggressive behavior towards those who are like himself. On the other hand he can easily identify those that are in some way different to himself, be it the colour of their skin, religion, whatever and then latch onto that, and use it to vent frustration and anger, for what is essentially his own failure.

Paul, please don't confuse them with logic. They will be very upset and will likely increase their racially/culturally based tantrums.

They're almost all very old men, and won't be with us for much longer. The younger generations are far more educated and knowledgeable than these poor geriatrics. Australia has a great and diverse future ahead.

Paul,
Nope, intra group violence is far more prevalent than inter group violence, "Racist" violence is almost unheard of in Australia and even in the U.S.A violent crime is a one way street, Black on Black, White on White, Mexican on Mexican.
What happens in multi racial communities is that trust within ethnic groups breaks down while trust between ethnic groups is strengthened, so poor Whites living in the most diverse areas tend to have generally positive perceptions of other ethnic groups because they have day to day contact with them. For example we might view Non Whites as more trustworthy in some respects, they might be seen as "solid" when it comes to, shall we say unorthodox business transactions and the cash economy. When I do business with middle class Asians things always go smoothly from my point of view because they tend to have a more laissez faire attitude toward rules and regulations but at the same time they want an "Aussie" tradesman as they don't trust their own because they'll rip them off, some have actually said that straight up. It's the same mentality as the White people who prefer Asian doctors or the many Aussie tradesmen who only hire Asian labourers and subbies, it's because they're seen as hard working, discrete and trustworthy while Whites are thought more likely to take liberties. You could say that everyone is on their best behaviour when dealing with people of different groups and the bitchiness and sledging is reserved for those with whom we have the most in common, and as Tommy Sotomayor pointed out during the Donald Stirling fiasco, it's just business, you don't have to like the people you work with, you don't have to trust them but during business hours you're nice to them all the same.
Paul I don't know where your side gets its ideas about racism because your activists and scientists consistently find that multiculturalism works, your posts make you sound like a doubting Thomas

"So in contrast to nationalism rootless cosmopolitanism is a dignified existence?"

If you were reflecting back my opinion, Jay of Melbourne, it would have been more accurate to ask, "So in contrast to unconditional nationalism rootless cosmopolitanism is a dignified existence?"

To which I would have said that it could be but it isn't an axiomatic dichotomy and depends on the validity, form and expression of the nationalism...

But as for 'rootless cosmopolitanism' I can send you a list of bars, clubs and parlours guaranteed to solve that problem. Though the issue of maintaining dignity under the circumstances would be entirely up to you. Not every interpersonal experience has a happy ending.