Bazz, I made no claim of CIA involvement. After all, how would I know? My claim of 9/11 is only that of observation combined with reason...how does an aircraft with a 160 feet wingspan disappear into a 67 foot hole in a building that's heavily reinforced, and leave no wing imprints on the outer wall or wreckage in front of that wall? And if you remember prior to 9/11, at least a couple times per year on the nightly news would be footage of a skyscraper or industrial chimney being demolished, with the narrative of the complex science of getting a building to collapse upon itself. Yet two aircraft, creating different damage configurations, create equally distributed heat throughout the two buildings in order for steel to give way simultaneously for a perfect collapse. The only heat to melt that steel being from a flash of aircraft fuel, and then burning office fixtures. Ponder it. Even building 7 collapsed perfectly upon itself, and it wasn't hit by any plane at all. One is forced to ask some serious questions about "coincidence", aren't they?

There's lots of anomalous inconsistencies to the entire affair. If you care to discuss it, I'll start a thread. I just find that the event defies reason. And I didn't believe it from day 2...day one, I was absorbed in the event like everyone else. But as it all unfolded over the following days and weeks, it was clear that the government had an agenda, were distorting and covering up details on the run, and firing experts that gave opinions the government didn't want, so they hired people that would.

My opinion on this doesn't stem from looking at conspiracy theories devised by others, and quite frankly, most of those things do more harm than good by their misguidance or outrageous claims...ranging from holographs to aliens.

I understand that it's a contentious issue steeped in emotion and tragedy. But in the cool light of day, there are a myriad of glaring anomalies.

And btw, thanks for responding.

Cheers.

Bazz>> Oh Gawd, the conspiracy nuts have arrived .That there was a conspiracy is clear but the CIA flying the planes
into the NYC Trade Centre is in another league altogether.<<

Bazz I have been here for a while...but Dick De Dastardly is certainly a newbie and an insightful orator.

9/11 stinks Bazz, I will tell you why.
Not just “one” first time in history event but “three” first times in history events as the skyscrapers fell to the ground (in their own footprints no less) supposedly due of fire. One was not even struck by a plane.

Whenever contact is lost with any airplane, fighter jets routinely take to the air to investigate. This commonly occurs about 100 times per year in well under 20 minutes. But on 9/11 nearly two hours passed without any interception, and they had three targets.

There is no mention of WTC Building 7's remarkable “collision less” collapse in the 571-page 9/11 Commission Report. The Bush administration resisted the formation of the 9/11 Commission for 441 days. Similar investigations, such as Pearl Harbor, the JFK assassination, Oklahoma City bombing and the space shuttle disasters, all started in one week.

The 911 commission was given absurdly limited funds to assure a short and limited investigation. In total $15 million was given by the Bush administration to investigate 9/11. Over $60 Million was spent investigating Bill Clintons’ affairs with Monica Lewinski.

These facts are just the tip of the dung heap…..Nah Bazz it stinks.