The Forum > General Discussion > ABC and freedom of the Press
ABC and freedom of the Press
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I said discuss not mention in passing.
For the illiterate Discuss: =
talk over, talk about, talk through, converse about, debate, confer about, put your heads together about, deliberate about, chew over, consider, exchange views on/about, weigh up, consider the pros and cons of, thrash out.
What you have produced is one line where the ABC mentions the "news that the ALP had been paying Thomson's legal bills"
Sorry, no cigar.
The article comes firmly down on the side of labor:
"Independent MP Rob Oakeshott, interviewed on ABC's AM on Thursday, articulated the dilemma for the fair-minded caught in the middle of this hostile and partisan political stoush:" .... " There are no charges, there is no conviction, and there is therefore no disqualification of a member in what our forefathers of the constitution set up as very prescriptive black and white rules on when a member can go. And this doesn't meet the test."
Not a mention that Thomson had been caught red handed and that the only reason he was not facing court is because the jurisdiction for this had been handed to Juliar's FWA that was quietly twiddling it thumbs for years. According to the ABC it was all the coalition's fault for being so mean and not according Thomson the presumption of innocence.
The ABC is as biased to the left as Newscorp is to the right or more so.