The Forum > General Discussion > Do you need to know? Radiation and Risk
Do you need to know? Radiation and Risk
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 6 February 2014 6:19:07 AM
| |
Radiation is always a risk.
But to compare this mess in Japan with other long term safe and working power plants is to compare oranges with grape fruit. Even the process of building Japans was questioned by world experts and building on an earth quake ground such as Japan typical of a strange culture of hiding the truth, even from them selves. Nuclear power is still Australia's best chance to impact on global warming and long term energy needs. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 6 February 2014 8:00:52 AM
| |
belly..for once learn..dont just react
govt lies..to you..kids are dying http://enenews.com/japan-times-column-nuclear-mutations-professor-increase-negative-effects-report-insect-leg-growing-head-photo get up to speed..three times they raised the 'safe'/background radiation..not just in japan..but usa http://whatreallyhappened.com/category/fukushima-disaster http://claireevans.hubpages.com/hub/Japan-nuclear-disaster-What-is-really-happening http://news.nationalgeographic.com.au/news/2011/03/110331-japan-radiation-health-mutations-nuclear-animals-ocean-science-world/ http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/teachers/09.pdf mate recall ddt..you wwere told it was a vitamin asbestos = good for you smoking is healthy a drink per day=good for you if your so healthy..why you going to docters who cant tell you why your there..for..[ seeking their subsidized free meds]..so because we swallowed the lie..the lies go on look at the cancer rate mate thats not smokers dying from smoking..our numbers have been halved yet you non smokers get cancer..AT.. the same rate..the same rate mate[ie its not smoking..so what else[atmospheric testing of nukes way back..[when they told you lies]... they stopped testing years ago but the mutation..is only now apparent [just like we are now beginning to see more mobile phone brain cancers..cancer takes its time[as said earlier..these 'vaccines'..and gmo..are causing many new cancers..as well as next generational sterility[your grand kids will be sterile..[sterilized..by govt malfeasance]..check out sterility/from..that vacine their giving to young girls..and soon boys..[it rots away their overies] and the mercury gives em altzheimers[check out those numbers too] belly i love you but mate you need to stop reading the sold-out sell-outs..the mainstream media..its 95%..owned by only 5 people..buy off them..they sell you any spin and abc/sbs..well they sell us..out too..first thing when they put the jews into the showers..was tell them watch out for the hot water..[then out came bayer-gas].. that was govt..fieldtesting.. usefull idiots ensure we are sheep. then govt retrains the kids to spy on their parents. they shut down the unions belly today there was some mug backing tony..think why..mate same master? Posted by one under god, Thursday, 6 February 2014 8:27:14 AM
| |
fact check..gardcil
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=gardasil+deaths&ie=utf-8 http://www.google.com.au/search?q=gardasil+melts+ovaries& http://truthaboutgardasil.org/injuries/ fact check media http://www.google.com.au/search?q=media+owned+by cancer expected to rise 57 percent in the next 20 years http://www.google.com.au/search?q=+cancer+rate+increasing anyhow im over commenting the web is full of lobby agenda trolls Posted by one under god, Thursday, 6 February 2014 8:39:18 AM
| |
There is more risk to your health from smoking than from any radiation we have around us at present Oneundergod.
I wouldn't worry too much if I were you. Posted by Suseonline, Thursday, 6 February 2014 10:06:22 AM
| |
onlinesue/quote..<,..There is more risk
to your health from smoking than from any radiation..>. mate smoking is my choice radiation..lol..just as bad as smoking..lol please read whar your saying they are both as bad..yet you go to war on smokers and unionists want more...radiation..less smoking?..cant you see what you yourselves are saying? <,There is more risk to your health from smoking than from any radiation we have around us at present>> lol..more risk..than <<..we have around us..at present..>> is that with the latest numbers? ie presently..post fukushimer..and now..or when? please give proof of what you unthinkingly just affirmed? radioactivity is good right?..better than smoking.. please make sure you keep taking the right pill. Posted by one under god, Thursday, 6 February 2014 10:31:34 AM
|
Nuclear Scientist J.W. Petermann of FukushimaUpdateReport.com evaluates the hazards of EMF radiation vs ionizing radiation, and the risks of the nuclear industry as a whole.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/05/20/national/iaea-inspector-backs-pumping-fukushima-groundwater-into-sea/#.UZvj88pxyUk
http://www.infowars.com/japanese-government-seeks-approval-to-dump-fukushima-groundwater-into-sea/