The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Penny pinching and SPC

Penny pinching and SPC

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All
All of which make obscene profits for some Australian billionaires and the rest of the profits are exported overseas.
Robert Le Page,
That money is created by employing many people. Where do the obscene amounts of money to pay the Academics & bureaucrats come from ?

How do you propose manufacturing, farming, almost anything else by way of industry can compete with that and stay competitive?
rehctub,
why has there to be such a competition ? Just you wait & see how many families will break up because of Fifo & it's money & who'll be paying the price for all thoes dysfunctional people when all goes ar$e up ? Our society will pay AGAIN !
Posted by individual, Friday, 31 January 2014 11:15:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Let Coca Cola pay
Posted by chrisgaff1000, Friday, 31 January 2014 11:16:05 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ChrisGaff1000 so they do!
Lets be honest say you owned butches once butcher shops, he told us he had at least two.
One is make a loss constantly and in the hundreds of millions.
Do you take the profits from one to prop up the other?
Will share holders in say Coke be happy to see losses of SPC propped up by what would be their loss.
Why not just drop the high income baby bonus and fund this community?
What is behind Abbott,s Socialism for the well off is he trying to breed the next generation of Liberals?
Silly yes, but still not as silly as drowning jobs and manufacturing while blessing high income earners.
Posted by Belly, Friday, 31 January 2014 11:27:23 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I say let the unions pay, they kept pushing the costs up & up.
Posted by individual, Friday, 31 January 2014 11:51:09 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
warmair - Are you for real 1) SPC is owned by Coca Cola why should taxpayers subsidize there profits?

If a business has 2 or more shops and 1 is not making a lot of profit but the other one is making lots of profit does that give them the right to get bailed out by the taxpayer NO!
Posted by Philip S, Friday, 31 January 2014 12:20:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yep, why should we give Coca Cola(tm) 25 million to support a failing venture? If it was worth it, I'm sure they could pull some of that 550 million they made last year to prop up SPC!

Unless you've been living under a rock, most people around the world are sick to death of .gov propping up big business.

In a normal world the failure of SPC would lead to a number of small mom and pop start ups taking over thereby distributing the wealth more evenly. Isn't that what everyone wants, a more even distribution of the wealth and opportunity?
Posted by RawMustard, Friday, 31 January 2014 12:30:08 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy