The BBC without any doubt, as a group, protected paedophiles in their ranks.
Now of course the ABC would not do that, would they? Well I have not heard of any investigation or allegations of a cover up.

The indication of guilty conscience or not is clearly indicated by the
opposition to the Freedom of Information application and the associated
court costs.

If they had a clear conscience they would have been happy to comply.

Pericles,

To say you were not going to shoot the messengers you have left a whole load of body bags laying around?

What is it about self-referential ideology that prevents you from even considering alternative perspectives? Is the content so distressing and so contrarian that you cannot even discuss it?

How on earth do you reconcile media reports like these below from Europe yesterday. I guess they are all written by those outside you self referencing domain and can therefore be dismissed? Or simply that since they have not and will not be covered by the ABC, it is a question of a non story and not censorship?

Green Fury As Europe Considers Scrapping Binding Renewables Targets - Financial Times, 13 January 2014

Europe In Full Retreat On Unilateral Climate Policy - EU-Info News, 11 January 2014

David Cameron Vows To Go ‘All Out For Shale’ -
Daily Mail, 13 January 2014

Total Fuels UK Fracking Rush With £30m Shale Stake - The Times, 13 January 2014

Anti-Fracking Protests Fail To Halt British Shale Revolution - The Guardian, 13 January 2014

Getting harder to “explain” the CAGW mantra isn’t it?

Pericles,

Just some of the secret attendees that reached the conclusion in relation to BBC coverage of CAGW that;

“...the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus”.

And the panel of experts that arrived at this conclusion included who?

Greenpeace? US Embassy? Church of England? Greenpeace China? Tear fund Ethiopia, Stop Climate Chaos? BP International? Npower Renewables? Head of BBC comedy?

It’s a comedy but not very funny.

Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
Trevor Evans, US Embassy
Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
Claire Foster, Church of England
Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
Jos Wheatley, Global Environment Assets Team, DFID
Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Eleanor Moran, Development Executive, Drama Commissioning
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes
Frances Weil, Editor of News Special Events
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Eleanor Moran, Development Executive, Drama Commissioning
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes

Our ABC is tied into the very same policy reached by these 28 “Experts”.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) are in accord that ‘AGW is real’. New editorial guidelines for both emphasize two imperatives: the need to ‘distinguish fact from opinion’ and to give ‘weight’ to the ‘body of evidence’.

“...the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus”.

Pericles, just in case you want to continue denigrating anyone who expresses a contrary CAGW perspective, could you now tell us about this panel of “experts” that gave you your opinion?

Start with BP, Head of Comedy and the Church of England if you like.