SM,

"....I am claiming that many "asylum seekers are dishonest rat bags, not the overwhelming majority."

So the overhwhelming majority of asylum seekers "aren't" dishonest ratbags?

In your opinion?

Okay.

P,

Yes, just a simple majority of asylum seekers are dishonest ratbags.

SM,

Okay, semantics it is.

Let's get this straight so I can enhance your intellectual reputation.

You say.

"....I am claiming that many "asylum seekers are dishonest rat bags, not the overwhelming majority."

and you say:

"Yes, just a simple majority of asylum seekers are dishonest ratbags."

So, it's both,

".....not the overwhelming majority."

and

"....just a simple majority."

Who are dishonest ratbags.

So "many" morphs into "majority" when it suits your argument?

Okay

(Lol!)

Poirot & SM,
If they are not dishonest ratbags when they arrive they some will be.

Parrot,

You were the one playing silly word games, and drawing stupid implications from what I said, so don't get huffy when I call you out.

The initial assessments of these asylum seekers rejects the applications of at least 30% as bogus, recently this figure appears to be much higher. Only appeals to the high courts which essentially won't send even a clear economic refugee back raises this to 99% acceptance.

With thousands of "refugees" flying in to Indonesia to then get on a boat, the % of rat bags could be anywhere from 30% to 70% and whether one of these ratbags get residence depends less on reality and more on how thoroughly the ratbag has destroyed his real history, and how well he has fabricated his new one.

SM (Minister for roolly clever namies),

Okay.

: )