The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Looney politician

Looney politician

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 28
  7. 29
  8. 30
  9. Page 31
  10. 32
  11. All
Dear SM,

It looks like you've run out of
arguments.
Posted by Foxy, Friday, 11 October 2013 1:08:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy,

I am not the one resorting to lying.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 11 October 2013 1:46:34 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Don't stop there, SM.

If you keep going I'm sure you'll adopt a contradictory stance like you have in the two most recent threads where you and I have crossed swords.
Posted by Poirot, Friday, 11 October 2013 1:59:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
P,

I can hold more than simple concept in my mind, so I don't need to lie.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 11 October 2013 2:34:02 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear SM,

I see - I should have known -
your side of politics doesn't lie.

Afterall, your party's political statements
are worded so that the opposite meaning can
be extracted from them. So a simple pre-election
statement such as,
"We shall tow the boats back," reads as follows:

"We shall tow the boats back subject to the prevailing
conditions, if we haven't got more important things
on the agenda, if it suits our international relations,
and if there is no more important message necessary to
win the next election."

That's not lying, that's merely the verbose, hypocritical,
mendacious, and ambiguous language of your politicians and
their hangers on. Its fundamental method is to be able to
extricate themselves from difficulties by claiming not
to have said what they did in fact say.

Or as Scott Morrison would state:

"This decision-making process with regard to this
matter is currently in place. It would be improper
for me at this point in time to pre-empt the
eventual outcome as the result of operational
consultations, one way or another, of that ongoing
decision and consultative process."

We get it.
Posted by Foxy, Friday, 11 October 2013 5:22:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What is it with these conservative Canberra politicians and weddings. Now we have Morrison and Assistant Minister for Defence Stuart Robert repaying taxpayer money wroughted for travel. They were at the wedding of WA Liberal MP Steve Irons at taxpayers expense.
SM, wouldn't it be wise for Tony Baloney and the rip off gang to support gay marriage, if for no other reason than it would be another chance to sting the taxpayer.
p/s Has Al sent out the invites for his nuptials yet? will Tony and the gang be there, will Gina Rhinoceros put on mining tax funded plane trip if the wedding in France or NZ.
Posted by Paul1405, Friday, 11 October 2013 7:52:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 28
  7. 29
  8. 30
  9. Page 31
  10. 32
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy