Poirot,

you really need to get over Tony becoming PM. You try and paint him as totally uncompassionate blah blah. Who really cares. Others tried to paint him as an enemy to the indigeneous, woman hater etc. And of course Juliar's cry on spending other peoples money is genuine. What all this has to do with killing the unborn mystifies me except that Abbott at least in rhetoric opposes abortion. Personally I would vote for Penny Wong if she could stop the baby killin g industry. You really should try to look for one good quality in Tony. It will help you more than him.

I do try to see things from runner's point of view...

"well I suppose if he had of cleaned up it would not be so bad eh!"

No. The entire story and situation was and is appalling.

But if you had written, "well I suppose if He had of cleaned up it would not be so bad eh!"

Then the response would be yes.

But He didn't. So He must not care enough to do anything about it, don't you think?

That He didn't is also an ethical and moral dilemma.

Appalling.

Thanks for that, Tony Lavis.

runner, what do you mean by "no matter how inaccurate"?

I provided a link which contained a copy of the letter of refusal.

How is that inaccurate?

You really do skate along on a wing and a prayer don't you.

This is a woman who has chosen with her husband to have a child. A wonderful thing, I think you'll agree. The Coalition has aims to make having a child and working to be more family friendly - at least that's the impression they like to give.

Fall at the first hurdle...and Pyne spins a load of old cobblers to add insult to injury.

Fascinating.....

Poirot

'This is a woman who has chosen with her husband to have a child. A wonderful thing, I think you'll agree. The Coalition has aims to make having a child and working to be more family friendly - at least that's the impression they like to give. '

maybe she should consider looking after the child instead of expecting Parliament to be disrupted and the tax payer to fork out each time the child catches a cold. This would make mfar more sense. If you were running a business you would be spewing if a father asked you to pay return airtickets and time off to visit a son with a cold.

Such great lenghts and costs for a mother who chose to go into politics and have a baby in contrast to the total lack of value placed on an unborn child who can legally be butchered.

Got that, runner.

Infant suffering flu and severe fever.

That's flu and severe fever...in case you missed it.

Sometimes flu and severe fever is life-threatening in infants.

And what does runner say in response?

"maybe she should look after her own child instead of expecting Parliament to be disrupted and the tax payer to fork out each time the child catches a cold...."

That's...".....each time the child catches a cold...." for those who might have missed it.

You seem to be regarding this infant's quite severe bout of illness as of next to no consequence - and certainly nothing that should rouse a working person to slip off the job to administer care.

I wonder what you'd have said if it was a man wanting to be with his severely ill child?

The gosnell incidence is a solid first step to educating the masses about the primary injustice which undergirds modern Western culture. But we still have so far to go...so many more to save...so much more shrewdness to exhibit for we are sheep surrounded by wolves.