The Forum > General Discussion > media scare
media scare
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
“A decade of deficits spells a bleak future for Australians,”
In fact, the bond market rallied on the day of the announcement of a $12 billion black hole.
Australia is one of only eight nations in the world rated ‘AAA’ by all three major ratings agencies, this makes our bonds highly sought after.
Big funds in London and New York look at Australia and see a South Seas Switzerland – strong public finances, solid growth, low unemployment, low inflation, good yields and politically stable.
The Wall Street Journal, last year described the Australia Government’s ‘AAA’ debt one of the few safe haven investments left in the developed world.
The shortfall in the budget is about 1% of GDP.
Imagine you’re a two-income household earning about $200,000 a year. You’ve done the household budget. You forgot to include Jasmine’s school trip, which is going to cost $2,000. That’s 1% of your household GDP. Well, that’s the position Australia is in.
And what about THE DEBT? Another analogy: Your household income is $200,000. Your mortgage is $20,000. You are no worse off than Australia's economy. Are you worried?
More perspective. Australia has an unemployment rate of 5.4%. In the US, the economy leading the world out of recession, unemployment is 7.7%, in Canada 7.0%, in the European Union about 11%, in Spain 27%.
Since the GFC Australia has gone from 15th to 12th largest economy in the world. In that time, 900,000 new jobs have been created. This is a period when in much of the developed world, millions of jobs have been lost and millions of lives destroyed.
Now what would have happened to our budget position if the government had taken the austerity route –Tens of thousands of people would have been thrown out of work. More unemployed, more social spending. Fewer employed means lower consumer spending.