The Forum > General Discussion > NZ Parliament will need to define what they mean by love
NZ Parliament will need to define what they mean by love
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Page 18
- 19
-
- All
Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 12:17:06 PM
| |
But you didn't ask me a simple question, onthebeach.
You imputed and attributed all kinds of experiences, views and oinions to me in your first post to me on this thread. Looky here... http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5746&page=0#160896 Yours was a loaded post...loaded with insult, your own imaginings and a goodly dose of antagonistic fervour. The only "ritual" on display here is the one where onthebeach plays the little terrier, latching on to a rhetorical trouser hem - and refusing to let go. Pal. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 12:18:14 PM
| |
Predictable too! LOL But as I already observed, it is not just likely but a dead certainty that some helpful posters would have drawn your propensities, especially that grandious sense of self-importance, to your attention ages ago, you being a long term poster on this site.
Now, back to those rather simple two questions that you refuse to answer: "- Are you or are you not a supporter of gay marriage? Yes or no. - If you are, then it is only reasonable to ask you to define what marriage means to you." Answering those should be a shoo-in for such a very clever and haughty Poirot. Posted by onthebeach, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 12:39:20 PM
| |
But, onthebeach, you've already been my mouthpiece - apparently.
Here's what you attributed to haughty moi. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5746&page=0#160931 I think that's a pretty inventive and comprehensive offering from you - but I'm a tad perplexed that you find the hem of my trousers so irresistible. I love the fact that you spout on and on about "rudeness". Do you consider your inked post above to fine form then, considering that it's entire repertoire came not from Poirot, but from your own confected assumptions? Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 1:03:31 PM
| |
Poirot,
Even your language is haughty, aptly illustrating your grandiousity. Others have mentioned it before, haven't they? LOL Two simple little questions. But goodness, what a carry-on to avoid answering them. Posted by onthebeach, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 1:40:00 PM
| |
onthebeach,
I didn't come onto this thread to answer your questions. I came onto this thread to say this to Josephus: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5746&page=0#160888 Since then I've been plagued with a yapping and growling in the general vicinity of my ankles. I think I've run out of doggy treats though.....you'll have to find someone else to annoy. Signed, Haughty Poirot Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 2:14:08 PM
|
See, we do understand that you're really rather limited
and can't help yourself. We'lll overlook this disfunction,
and will try (if we have nothing better to do) to
speak to you later.
Take care and try to stay calm. ;-)