Whatsit2ya,
you don't by any chance happen to be someone with a BA & employed by some unaccountable Government Department ?

Whatsit2ya, here's four positives.

1. He's not Julia Gillard
2. HE will be running the party, not the faceless men from behind.
3. He has a party background that has history on it's side, like paying off labor debt, making employing easier, not harder and doesn't waste money we don't have.
4. He realizes that while we may well be the envy of the world, the rest, who we gauge ourselves against, are in REALLY POOR SHAPE, something that makes us look better than we are.

Now I say this because the worlds smartest treasurer has kept our economy running, BY BORROWING MONEY nothing else.

Now while on that subject, history suggests that had we not had a change back in 07, we would have money in the bank, still have strong confidence and be far better off than we are today, while enjoying the benefits of a government, that governs and keeps our borders protected, you know, just like they did before.

History doesn't go away and labor's history in the past 20 odd years is waste, missmanagement and disruption of IR.

While the libs history, during the same period is sensible government, debt repayment and border protection.

Now I have plenty more posetives, but let's see how you respond to these first.

Now as for labor, I now call on you to name JUST THREE posetives they can deliver.

More importantly, if you can name them, then perhaps you can explain why the hell they are waiting till now to implement just three things that work.

You may also wish to consider the dozens of failures they had as well.

Now while your straining your brain, please remember, WE HAVE NO MONEY LEFT thanks to your beloved labor.

My tip.
Labor will get flogged, the libs will find a trigger for a DD election, and we can throw out the senate and start fresh.

Only 187 sleeps to go!

Only 187 sleeps to go!
rehctub,
that is scary as to how much more time they have to keep ruining us.

Whatsit2ya,

For all your invective of TA and praise of Juliar, your view appears to be distinctly in the minority, where in Australia, TA is seen as a prefered PM to the train wreck that is Juliar.

To rehctub,you have completely embarrassed yourself. Your 4 points to promote Tony are completely inept. I'm inclined to feel sorry for you but that would only encourage ignorance. I'm winning this argument with one hand tied behind my back because of the mental deficiency of those in Abbott's corner. Pt1: is that an attempt at humour...? That comment passes judgement on you, its puerile and lame. When Tony does his silly little contrived chuckle from time to time,look at his eyes (they don't lie) you will see a man void of substance.
Pt2: "he will run the party" whilst that's debatable,it's not exactly an endorsement of his capacity to lead.
Pt3: "his party has a history",again debatable and yet again not an endorsement .
Pt:4:" Aust only looks good in comparison", then you proceed with your liberal lemmings rhetoric including the classic blame game rhetoric.
This is an epic fail by you,please don't respond to my comments in future. You are the epitome of the ignorant masses,you regurgitate right wing media with no individual thought.

Sorry, is that Whatsit2ya, some type of code for WHAT A TOSS.

You must realize that the bulk of Aussies are against you, why even the labor laughables are lookimg for answers, but go right ahead and keep dreaming if you think Julia is a better option as PM.

So although you ask that I don't respond to your posts, I think you can at the very least answer my questions, just like I answered yours.

Besides, you shot the first bullet, not me, so you can't now run and hide.