@ SPQR

The actual % of CO2 in the atmosphere that “THE SCIENCE” says was derived from human activities is variously estimated at between 3-5% .

I don't know where or how you arrive at that figure but the reality is that the global concentration of Co2 has risen from 280 Ppm to 355 Ppm. I would be interested in your explanation as to where you think this extra Co2 came from ?

How dare you link to real climate science Poirot!

What would people like Rahmstorf, Raypierre or any of the others know?

And Skeptical Science? Come off it - they link to each other!

Wait a minute, hazy links to them as well! Maybe he just doesn't get it, hehehe :)

@Warmair,

<< I would be interested in your explanation as to where you think this extra Co2 came from ?>>

It's sounding very much like someone has misled you into believing that humans produce most of the CO2 (and with a name like "Warmair"
you have no doubt contributed more than your quota).

FYE (For Your Edification):
1) http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

And just in case you find that source NON-halal and not fit for consumption (a trick Poirot often pulls when something doesn't sync with her preconceived notions!)

Here's another:

2)http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/GlobalWarmingPrimer.pd

Gosh, I know, qanda....the problem is that I just can't help myself.

Strange as it may seem, I always get a hankering to link to actual climate scientists when I wish to glean a little something concerning climate science (stoopid I know : )

Perhaps I should take a page out of SPQR's book and link to a conservative think tank - I'm sure they're "full of it" : )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_for_Policy_Analysis

<< Gosh…Perhaps I should take a page out of SPQR's book and link to a conservative think tank>>

Hehehe …true to form!

Golly gosh, I would dearly loved to have cited a “climate scientist”… or even a straight dyed-in-wool–loony-left–Poirot- preferred source.

And there hundreds of ‘em out there, all spruik figures/graphs/charts with the volumes of CO2 released, the sources of all that anthropogenic CO2, and all the bad things you never wanted to know about CO2.

But, strangely enough--in the short time I had available – I could not locate any that showed the atmospheric percentages of anthropogenic vis-à-vis non-anthropogenic CO2. One can only surmise that if you are hell bent on pushing the line that we are drowning in anthropogenic CO2, it's NOT A GOOD LOOK to reveal that only 3-5% per cent of emissions are anthropogenic!

SPQR,

Further reading - http://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-intermediate.htm