The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Pop goes the weasel.

Pop goes the weasel.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 27
  7. 28
  8. 29
  9. Page 30
  10. 31
  11. 32
  12. 33
  13. 34
  14. 35
  15. 36
  16. All
The post above mine is ,well extraordinary!
From a poster who asures us he is never wrong.
One who brings calls for some balance, from posters on his side of politics.
For all the time I have posted here,NO POSTER has come near criticizing his/her own party as much as me.
And time and again my challenge, to him and others to start just a single thread,about the problems on his side of the house, are left in the dust.
It is said Conservatives have more fears of what MAY happen driving them.
My side? more adventurous.
Both sides, yes both, must confront this.
A government has NEVER had more than 53% two party after election.
The victory in excepting the win, PROMISES TO RULE FOR EVERY ONE.
SM,a handful of others, some out of a mind too closed to understand, Condemn ALP voters to a lesser world.
Of them all, only this man I can not forgive, he alone appears to have the intellect to know better.
That, in my view, questions his ability to see the big picture.
Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 11:37:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly,

You also make more unsubstantiated and one eyed attacks than anyone else on Abbott and myself. Your claim of balance based on acknowledging some of the most blatant flaws in Labor is ridiculous.

I see the Labor MP / ex Union boss Craig Thomson is back in the news with a Police raid on his house and headquarters.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 11:51:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thomsons lawler is defending him to the hilt. His lawler is going to systematically sue every one that had a share in the Thomson debacle.
Posted by 579, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 12:32:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
579,

You make it too easy. He already sued Fairfax and lost. Please tell him to try and sue me, I would love to clean him out.

To help you:

Thomson is a crook that sleeps with prostitutes using his company credit card. That should be enough to get him going. The only thing he will need to win is for this to be false.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 2:50:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
At this stage what charges have been laid against Craig Thomson.
Are you aware EVERY BRANCH OF EVERY UNION funds the local ALP person in an election, this funding increases if it is one of your own.
579, you are aware I am ex union.
Too that IF and WHEN this bloke is found guilty, I would see him go to prison.
I wait and hope,he is not, I Personally, have rang in to the office, from interstate, and booked up things on the Boss, Union branch Secretary, Gold credit card.
It could happen.
579, you and I are feeding a man so fixed in his views, we give him reason for his slanders.
You, as I do, know his claims of always being right, being better informed brighter than us are a joke.
Maybe covering a symptom of something else.
Quite a few are convinced they are the second coming or such.
I am weary of the bloke weary of feeding him my indignation.
If you insist in attempting to swim up a water fall I leave the increasingly strident Gent to you.
Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 3:58:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly,

I could not have slandered Thomson, as slander is spoken. I think you meant libel.

Libel is defined as:

A published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation

I don't want to go through the legal steps he would have to take to successfully sue me, but he has more chance of falling pregnant.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 4:27:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 27
  7. 28
  8. 29
  9. Page 30
  10. 31
  11. 32
  12. 33
  13. 34
  14. 35
  15. 36
  16. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy