Still wiggling and waggling, SM.

While I understand your political leanings drive your desire to remain wide eyed and naive, please don't assume that the rest of us are that stupid.

>> Considering the numerous and completely unsubstantiated accusations you level at Abbott and the Coalition you are hardly in any position to pontificate. <<

HaHaHaHaHa

Hypocritical pontificator yourself.

Poirot,

Neither Thomson, the HSU or his defence have any time tried to claim that this was not the card issued to him. The only people trying to claim this as proof that the card was forged are some bloggers.

Company cards are issued in the companies name with the name of the user supplied by the company unchecked by the CC company as the company to whom the card is issued is liable. I have seen this happen more than once, and the card users continued to use the card until a corrected one arrived.

I am also able to form an opinion without relying on the judgement of the court. If this was the only arbiter, then the DJ's CEO was not guilty of sexual harassment, nor was Richard Pratt guilty of price fixing as both cases were settled with admission of wrong doing.

For example can you honestly expect me to believe that in 12 separate instances prostitutes were paid for by Mr Thomson's card that has been forensically linked to him (ie signatures) and he has never once spotted the errors on his expense claim?

Tell me that in your heart of hearts you actually believe that all 65 separate charges were all a set up.

Mr Wiggles (BM)

Grow up.

"Grow Up"

Spoken like the OLO pontifcator you are.

Wiggle-waggle all you like 'shadow', but there is due process to follow.

From any perspective, you're still only leading a lynch mob from a kangaroo court of your own making.

All of the texts that related to any thing of a sexual nature have been published. Those half a dozen texts were it. So where is the sexual harassment, against Ashby as was supposed to be the charge.
No wonder a decision can-not be made.
A few filthy texts do not constitute a sexual harassment finding.
The driving force behind the court case was corrupted by other influences. Cab charges, and sexual harassment, along with the commonwealth failing to supply a safe workplace.
A return bout is needed to see where these charges originated from.

Good morning Shadow Minister for every day I have been here, you and I have not got on.
Only a missing contributor long gone, has been harder to like.
I love open debate, you have no idea of the terms meaning.
You called me liar, on the slimmest of, not existing evidence.
You add color to the place, not a nice color but color still.
You understand do you not?
I refrain from my true feelings about you being put in to print, you have every right to yours.
Me to mine, unstated.
IF you are not Christopher Pyne, you indeed do a fine job of looking like him.
Julie Bishop? Bronwyn? getting warm? Sophey Mirabella?
Enjoy your romp in the sand pit try not to piddle on too many feet on the trip.

The case about Slipper was designed to cause disruption, frustration, and annoyance, there was no sexual harassment.
The filthy texts were the sole reason behind the case.
The judges decision to reserve judgment may take three months before judgment is realized.
The whole case was designed solely to penalize Slipper for jumping camp, and have a filthy text released.
Several noalition members knew of the existence of slippers text to Ashby, and the whole setup was to get Slipper.
Slipper was meant to resign from parliament, and not just move seats.