The Forum > General Discussion > How much more diversity?
How much more diversity?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
Posted by WmTrevor, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 12:54:23 PM
| |
The hilarious thing is, if the DNA of most of the posters here was analysed, it would reveal that they had mostly Slavic or Middle-Eastern roots in their biological origins.
(I once watched a show anlaysing some quintessential English people, and that's exactly what the scientists found) Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 1:07:14 PM
| |
Poirot,
You may be right but, are we not talking about cultural differences rather than genetics or DNA? At least that is what i assumed Drab was writing about. There are vast differences in cultures. Posted by Banjo, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 1:19:06 PM
| |
I take your point, Banjo. But it does demonstrate that human migration and close interaction between peoples of different cultures is a distinct trait in our species.
Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 2:29:00 PM
| |
Simple answer to the question just look at all the problems England has with all the different ethnic immigrants they took in. The country is now stuffed.
Posted by Philip S, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 2:48:32 PM
| |
Poirot,
I know you think Anglophobia is funny but you're so wrong it's laughable in itself http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/mythsofbritishancestry/ Why diversity is not a strength, podcast by Mark Weber: http://reasonradionetwork.com/downloads/tmwr/VoR-The_Mark_Weber_Report-20120620.mp3 Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Wednesday, 5 September 2012 6:41:38 PM
|
Why not vindication? Surely evidence should be allowed to be presented.
It only seems fair since drab has had the benefit of the whole article. Presumably.
For me, before I devote any more time to Dr Salter, I want to see the statistics behind the statement, "Moreover, they [ethnically homogeneous nations] are less prone to civil war, the greatest source of violent death in the twentieth century."