The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Ron Paul betrays and Romney gets annointed.

Ron Paul betrays and Romney gets annointed.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All
UOG ,Prehaps the Paul Clan think they can be more effective on the inside with influence than being expelled totally.It may be a good tactic.

Paul professes to be a man of God,but how do you profess Godliness and make deals with war mongering devil like Mitt Romney?
Posted by Arjay, Tuesday, 19 June 2012 6:29:29 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
maybe you stopped watching but

Montana Madness:
GOP establishment shuts out Ron Paul supporters

By: From the Trenches
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/montana-madness-gop-establishment-shuts-out-ron-paul-supporters/16476


The GOP elephant just stepped on and crushed its hardest workers. Such was the aftermath of the last weekend’s Republican State Convention in Missoula, and the ones who may pay the dearest price for this stunning display of spitefulness will likely be the candidates on the statewide Republican ticket.

The Party has just shot itself in the foot
and may have shot its candidates in the back.

Political conventions in election years are normally all about building unity, laying aside differences and “closing ranks” around the part’s chosen nominees. Accordingly, the opening speech by former governor Judy Martz on Friday morning struck just the right chord

a gracious recognition of what the ideas of Ron Paul and the enthusiasm his supporters have come to mean to the Republican Party. Martz then called upon this strong and active contingent of the Montana GOP to join with the others in forming a united front for victory.

or
ron paul dont endorse rommulust
http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=19180

Fed Members Gave Their Own Banks
$4 Trillion In Secret Bailouts
http://moneybagsworld.blogspot.com/


Firm.........................Bailout amount
Citigroup........................$2.5 Trillion
Goldman Sachs.............$814 Billion
JP Morgan.....................$391 Billion
Lehman Brothers............$183 Billion
State Street Corporation..$42 Billion
KeyCorp .......................$40 Billion
Marshall & Ilsley............$21 Billion
Citibank.........................$21 Billion
General Electric (GE)......$16 Billion
Sun Trust.......................$7.5 Billion
PNC..............................$6.5 Billion
Texas Capital Bank........$2.3 Billion
Webster Bank................$2.2 Billion
Popular Inc....................$1.2 Billion
Wilmington Trust............$550 Million
LegacyTexas..................$5 Million
http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=19179
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 20 June 2012 8:06:39 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think that a quick trip to the dictionary might be in order, one under god.

>>Fed Members Gave Their Own Banks $4 Trillion In Secret Bailouts<<

"Gave" is the past tense of the verb "to give", the definition of which is to "freely transfer the possession of (something) to (someone)".

What happened in your example is the act of "lending", which in this context is defined as "allowing a person or organization the use of a sum of money under an agreement to pay it back later, typically with interest"

The other problem that you have with our language is the word "secret", understood to signify something that is "not known or seen or not meant to be known or seen by others".

The moneys that the article refers to appeared (mirabile dictu) on the balance sheet of every bank mentioned, and those balance sheets were published and available to the general public. You can even find them on the internet.

Most people I know, except the most dedicated of conspiracy theorists, would describe those transactions using an antonym of "secret" - something like "unconcealed, open, overt, public, acknowledged etc. etc."

To put these actions into their proper context, the headline should read "Fed lends money to Banks". Which is part of their job description.

But its so much more fun to see evil around every corner, isn't it, imagining that there is somewhere a coterie of predatory bankers, hell-bent on making your life a total misery.

Incidentally, has it ever occurred to you to wonder where the Fed gets its money from? The answer might surprise you.

Have a great day.
Posted by Pericles, Wednesday, 20 June 2012 9:30:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
pericules/quote..''Incidentally,..has it ever occurred to you
to wonder where the Fed gets its money from?

The answer might surprise you.""

let me reply your question with the same question
AS TO HOW THE REPAYMENT*...

Firm.........................Bailout amount
Citigroup........................$2.5 Trillion
Goldman Sachs.............$814 Billion
JP Morgan.....................$391 Billion

where is that extra money comming from

but i will reply my own question
IF YOU REPLY YOUR'S

ok on faith here is mine
citigroup lend 2.5 TRILLION*
at what rat?..,,[nix?..or 1%..say]

then cash in govt Bonds..promising 3%

worst thing is..goldman sax thunk it
they are the poisen that saw greeks spend BORROWED money on arms
via goldman harburg sax inc..who been scamming govt money for a long long time..

getting greeks bonds
while at the same time selling short on their default
too clever by half your mates

so please reply your own question
and watch..as greek banks bleed billions of euro's
via depositers drawing out a billion euro per day..[so the greks need bailout..from german banks..[who now hold the greek pannic funds]

govts dont bailout banks
if a govt promise..TO A BANK..dont do it
it never shoulf fall onto the taxpayer tomoncover the bailout bond

banks have no right to monetise
lor lend back to govt at 200%..proffit

read creature of jeckle island
why do you still defend the lies

[could be my last post]
as my comment at fairfax is deleted]
these money fixated grubs are bleeding us dry

did you watch last nights keiser report
dynomite..spot on as usual[plus china bying up big on gold

thats what got sadman insane and gadaffi into being dead
they too wanted the gold..but gold diggers dont want that
they prefer mugs buy a promise..or take an option..not seek the actual product..[and thats where a lot of money went]

bying paper promise

to buy a 'securitised'..paper
that in the end comes to a masive default
as promise bails out promise..[one good thing..is people arnt keeping their paper..cause when we do we get massive inflation...but people just want to know..their cash is safe
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 20 June 2012 10:02:35 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I'm a simple soul – at least that's what it sounds like people call me – and I just don't understand…

We have been told by the connedspiricists time, and time, and time, and time again that all of these banks can simply magic money out of thin air and 'print' new money whenever they want and with no oversight or control.

So, given that, how is it that any of them can go broke, owe and need money as a bailout from governments? These same governments who haven't made any money of their own since the Federal Reserve was established in 1913?

It's been almost 100 years – you'd think someone would have noticed there was no money before now. But over that century there are three times as many people on the planet and despite this there are more people in more places better off than at any other time in history.

I just don't understand… but at least, apparently, I'm not alone.
Posted by WmTrevor, Wednesday, 20 June 2012 11:25:22 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
WM/quote..""We have been told by the connedspiricists""

love the word ab-use..llooll

"""time,[edirted]..and time again
that all of these banks...can simply magic money
out of thin air..and 'print'..new money..whenever they want

and with no oversight or control.
So,..given that,..how is it that any of them can go broke,""

good question..how indeed
easy..see how the fed gives you credit
is you bank a fraction..with it...[this deposit]..is leveraged
[up to 80 fold..but now is trying to go back to a 45 to one leverage

so they need to find cash
to meet the fed deposit arrangements

add to this that loop of govt lending...from banks
any bailout..from govt needs FIRST..meet the reserve requirments

thus now its mandated..a bulk is to be held in govt bonds
[and they cant be redeemed..[except by a bank]

cribe it better
or maybe he dont know only ridicules

""These same governments..who haven't made any money of their own since the Federal Reserve..was established in 1913?""yes egsactly
govt issued war bonds that time
bankers bought them all up
DEMANDED IMMEDIATE PAYMENT*..govt didnt have it in gold/silver
so the banks declared govt bankrupt..and govt bought in income tax..to repay the outstanding debt

""It's been almost 100 years
you'd think someone would have noticed..there was no money before now.""

no see the fed simply prints more
[monetory easing]..sure the extra notes cause inflation
but heck that deflates the actual debt..plus the debt id in notes..YOU GOT THE GLOBAL FRANCHISE OVER*

they want notes
they MUST come to you

or they send you broke
or send your bankers broke
they really are broke[but lest we forget
the british bank was formed from a tax stick
yep a tax reciept.[debt]..founded the bank of england

in usa...they promised
took the gold silver[fort knox gold is rusting]

""But over that century..there are three times
as many people on the planet and despite this..there are more people in more places better off..than at any other time in history.""

YESterdaymaybe
but tomorrow they woke up homeless
just watch..you never lived in a receeding declioning failing system have you?
Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 20 June 2012 3:26:58 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy