The Forum > General Discussion > Are Australian banks good or bad?
Are Australian banks good or bad?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
However, not too long ago many were relieved that Australia dodged the worse of the GFC and this can be partially attributed to the relative conservative nature of the local banking system (in contrast to the awful situation then in the US).
My opinion is that the banks are businesses, the big dollar profits quoted are “reasonable” when compared to their turnover and they owe a return on investment to the shareholders, which include many superannuation investments which will ultimately be returned to the mums and dads on retirement (minus some fees, but that’s another topic). We need to get away from the 19th century Punch images of the fat-cat capitalist bankers and be realistic about assessing modern corporations. These institutions seem to be operating conservatively in a shaky global climate and it was this attitude that helped us dodge the direct bullet strike a few years ago (just a flesh wound).
And to put it into perspective, I’m reasonably happy with the mortgage interest rate I pay today compared to the 14% I started at in the early 90’s.
So, should we be quietly confident and thankful that the Aussie banks have a good steady hand on the tiller or should we be angry that they seem to be reluctant to follow the RBA monetary policy detail to the second decimal place and suggest that they are operating as a greedy oligopoly that is a law unto itself?