Planet your foot prints lead clearly to arjay.
You highlight my inability to spell.
I highlight your inability to think.
Japan for reasons even you can understand is not the average but the extreme.
Nuclear power never should have been used there.

Note also Planet3 that Prof Busby says the USA were using some sort of new nuke in Fallugah and not DU.

Since 1900 cancer rates have trebled while other death causes such as heart disease has fallen.In Iraq serious birth defects have increased by 242% since 1992.The insideous side of these poisons is their slow slient destruction of our genetics and bodies.These particles have low radiation but mimic other elements such as calcium and our bodies don't reject them.They then over the years destroy us slowly from within.

Anyone who compares these elements with smoking dangers is a fool.

<Anyone who compares these elements with smoking dangers is a fool.>

Yes indeed, this Nature article predicts 450 million smoking related deaths in the first half of this century.

http://www.nature.com/nrc/journal/v9/n9/full/nrc2703.html

By comparison, Fukushima is yet to cause a death from leaked radiation. And what does Fallujah have to do with Fukushima? Are you suggesting that the Japanese intend to dispose of the nuclear waste by extracting the U238, forming it into artillery shells and firing it around the countryside?

"You highlight my inability to spell.
"I highlight your inability to think.

So two wrongs then make a right:) My inability
to think comes from others unable to translate..lol.
Your a cheeky sod,but well pointed out:)

So festers way of justifying the currant situation, is to compare tobacco deaths to farming land, the counties water supplies, birth defects and so on.....450 million is nothing compared with whats been outlined....Quoted so far....tank shells! Thanks for opening the exact reasons why the whole unclear program needs to be shut down.

Its typical human behaviour to recycle/utilize waste products. It stands to reason, that mankind will find other uses for it and eventually into the food systems it goes.

Yukio Edano, Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary, said shipments of spinach from four provinces surrounding the plant had been halted. Milk shipments from Fukushima province have also been banned.


Mr Edano, the increasingly haggard face of the Japanese government's response to the crisis, sought to quell fears by saying radiation levels in food were not harmful to human health, and that he was prepared to eat contaminated produce himself.


He said: "Even if you eat and drink them several times it will not be a health hazard. So I would like you to act calmly without reacting." Asked if he would be happy to give spinach and milk to his family, he said: "Of course."


His comments were reminiscent of when John Gummer, the then Agriculture Minister, was pictured with his four-year-old daughter and half-eaten hamburgers, in an attempt to calm the British public during the "mad cow disease" outbreak in 1990.


The World Health Organisation appeared to disagree with Mr Edano, announcing that radiation seeping into food and water was "a lot more serious" than previously thought.

Belly....I use the word unclear instead of nuclear because thats the clear facts to fooling around with this stuff.

Little boys with there new toys.

Remember belly, humans learn by mistakes....

and like I said, "there are NO second chances with unclear..sorry (for bellies sake:) thats nuclear energy.

cc

Fester,when you stop smoking for a few years,your body recovers.These nuke elements stay with you for life and the environoment for thousands and millions of years.

Like smoking,it takes decades for the cell destruction to eventuate.Smoking does not cause serious genetic deformities that you pass onto your children.If you read the articles,85 times Chernobyl affects the entire planet.What Gunderson,Helen Caldicot,Prof Chris Busby and others are saying,we soon may not have enough genetic integrity to make future generations viable.

Add into the mix we have the Western lunatics thinking they can win a strategic nuke war against Russia/China?

After Chernobyl, the anti-nukes were predicting all manner of catastrophe, none of which eventuated. I guess that is why the scaremongering has morphed into the unsubstantiated bunk that you guys are spouting.

<These nuke elements stay with you for life and the environoment for thousands and millions of years.>

New designs can use the waste from current reactors as fuel, and in turn leave far less waste which need only be contained for a few centuries at most.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/feb/02/nuclear-reactors-consume-radioactive-waste