Pericles and Belly we have a conga line of world leaders talking about their New World Order including both Bushes,Henry Kissenger,Bill Clinton,Hilary Clinton,Gary Hart,Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Obama.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHMcoHEasJg Here you will see these words "NEW WORLD ORDER" eminating from their lips.

Christopher Monckton said this at Cophengagen when they tried to bring the ETS and carbon tax globally.Bob Brown supports "Global Governance".There are just so many thick heads who refuse to look at the reality.

Yeah yeah, Arjay.

>>There are just so many thick heads who refuse to look at the reality.<<

We are all thick, and you are the smart guy. We should know that by now, you have told us enough times.

But, just so that you can prove it to us all over again, why not have a shot at answering the question that I posed obliquely in my earlier post? Here it is, in cut down form, to make it easier to understand.

Is the fact that China owns a large proportion of US debt a) good for China or b) good for the US? A sentence or two of explanation would help us thick-heads, so long as you use easy words.

If there is a case for c) neither or d) both, that would be fun to hear as well.

Looking forward to a bit of Arjay-style education.

Gotcha arjay!
Took time but you are from mad magazine aren't you?
Spy vs spy, knew I had seen it before

Pericles,China might own the debt and have the industrial assendency but the USA has 700 bases around the planet,a serious nuke defence shield and it seems new mini nuke technology which they think gives them the edge over Russia/ China.

Add into the mix a growing public awareness of the theft by these Oligarcical Banksters and we have desperate people seeking war as an escape from us.

Way to go Arjay. Anything but answer a straight question, eh.

>>Pericles,China might own the debt and have the industrial assendency but the USA has 700 bases around the planet<<

Let's take a closer look, shall we?

The US has a Defence budget nine times that of China. Without China owning their debt (i.e., lending them money), the US would be unable to spend the $900 billion plus that they do every year on their "700 bases", and their "mini nuke technology".

So, in the most obvious way imaginable, China is providing the money that builds the US military capability. How good is that?

The question remains: is China happy or unhappy owning US paper?

As you made clear to us:

>>There are just so many thick heads who refuse to look at the reality.<<

So, educate us, please.

Oh, and another thing, Arjay.

>>Add into the mix a growing public awareness of the theft by these Oligarcical Banksters and we have desperate people seeking war as an escape from us.<<

Wars cost money.

Whom would these "Oligarcical Banksters" choose to fight against?

Think of it in terms of revenue and profit (which I am sure is what you conceive these "banksters" do), and try to work out how on earth any of them could possibly make anything except a massive loss from a war.

Even a war against China, in an attempt, say, to avoid repayment of their massive borrowings there, would cost more than they would save, and last longer than any of them could hope to live. What on earth would be the point?