Houellebecq,

While not a fan of profanity, banning profanity by innuendo is very small minded, and I would have thought that there were more serious things to get your kn*ckers twisted about.

I take the StG approach here, congrats for getting the boot in to that idiot and fumbling GN who should know better.
Recently in public an elderly matron, after barging her trolley in to the legs of almost every shopper took offense to the word &hit!
And condemned her victims to hell internal,while they moped up the blood.
We live by standards, too often foolish ones PC rules!

I didn't follow the full coverage of the story Houllebecq but apparently the eponymous UK Sofa King general manager – first name Wayne, I believe – claimed the international media and Internet coverage of the saga was "costing the economy $20 billion a second".

oh dear sofa king hot
or sofa king cool
not_what?

heck its just a throw away line
i would never have joined the dots
and feel i shouldnt have had to

sofakingwhat
the twat

I believe profanity to be really worth while at times. And often times it is more "rewarding" when the object of the verbal abuse thinks that it is wrong to do so.

..

Far more offensive to me is the view of the likes of the child abusers, baby thieves, homophobes and those that cover up for them all, that not withstanding their nefarious activities, they still want to vainly insist that they are spoken to with "respect."

I think not.

..

Sometimes, i.m.o., it is better to be brutally honest to the extent of liberally applying the profane so that there can be room for doubt or misinterpretation that the activities of any person or persons is exceptionally disturbing and upsetting to another or others.

Gday dream on hows it going?
You may find it interesting.
I did goggled The Australian Peoples Party TAPP for short.
Has an interesting history that name.
Many claimants , some quite long time ago.
Any thoughts?