steven...increaso of momentum
increases..the relitive impact force

think of a karate'chop
the weight of the hand stays the same
but the momentum..of it increases the force

its like the same hand..i tap your shhoulder with
now is rocket powerd..a fly moving at the speed of sound
will pass straight through your windshield..because of its momentum

not its 'extra weight'

think of a plane[dry weight]

being so light it flies
yet so heavey..it sinks

all depending on thrust
throttle and wind direction
i dont see why you cant see it

ok think of it like this
i got a really really long rocket
[i mean so long that it takes say..5 days to use its fuel]

i set it off
it gets lighter and lighter as it moves ever faster
getting heavier...lol..[increasing mass..lol
when in fact the mass..[fuel/weight..
is being left behind

but as its getting faster and faster
you claim its getting heavier

mate
dream on
where is that 'mass'..comming from?

its not mass ..;its energy..
[put into motion]..thus momentum
think like
you clothing..in the spin dryer

by your theory..that faster it moves
the heavier it is just by moving

lol

[except..as it goes faster
the water loss..ensures its getting lighter]

are you quoting from the link?
or sumerising

im only reacting to your words
and like with evolution..it seems again
belief..[faith]..not experteaze

mass..is defined..by the NUMBER of electrons/protons etc
moving arround the atom's poles..in a figure 8 motion

the more
the heavier its mass

moving the atom[and its ancilary mass]
faster..dont increase the atomic weight..
of that in motion..[under laws of momentum]

[in lue of proof
it dont..]

i cant find another mechanism..or law,..
that deigns..*increase of the parental..[origonal]...mass]
only that of its momentum

<< All scientists, not just climate scientists, are engaged in a conspiracy …>>

Come now Steven, if your article was about climate “science” it would have had to be titled: Oops! Oops! Oops! and Oops! again.

Or perhaps, just: Oops! followed by a long intoxicated giggle.

HAHAHAHA ...

"There goes another one"

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4731#124683

Steven - watch this space indeed.

<See: Loose cable to blame>

Maybe, but no source of error has been found as yet. What you see is a process of exhaustive speculation and checking, and repetition of the experiment in other labs. Either an error will be found, else the science will have to change.

Fester wrote:

>>Maybe, but no source of error has been found as yet.>>

Technically you're right. The experiment will have to be repeated after the apparatus has been repaired.

However this was always a bit of a long shot and the odds just got longer.

Still, it would be nice if it turned out there was some way of travelling faster than light

Wasn't there there some belief that man would die if he attempted to travel at over 60 miles per hour? A totally irrational thought, but believed by many.

Then it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of sound. A bit more rational this one, but only requiring the application of some engineering.

What will it take to exceed the speed of light? Magic perhaps, or just some more engineering?