i am so over the lot of em

here we got a choice
between a one man band[who thinks he alone is allways right]
and a wisp of grass..that blows in the winds of change
one who follows orders

one cant take order
the other follows any order

the result will only be dissorder
its only a matter of time

it took a rudd..to beat the rudd
or rather a howard like rudd]..to bring down the howard

those with her ear..want to keep the can do girl
and will fight to reject the one man band

rudd cant win..[just like a supa/nova..it has its final flareup
then melts back into subserviance...[juliar is allready there]

dont start me on the ab-bot
or that clownish sceming banker
waiting to do a juliar...on the liberal to chosen class
[only too willing to further exploit or demean the lower classes]

I am beginning to be convinced that Mr Rudd should
NOT challenge at this time for the leadership of
the Labor Party. It would be a bad move on his part.
He should simply be patient and sit it out on the
back-bench for the time being. This would embarrass
the heck out of his opponents. However, it would be
an excellent strategy. Let things take their natural
course. Let the PM lead the Party into the next election.

It will inevitably guarantee a Liberal win. Voters
will again be given a chance to experience life under the
Libs. For a short term. THEN at the next election, Mr Rudd
can challenge and guarantee a long-term Labor win.

By challenging now - Mr Rudd will be playing into the hands
of his opponents. Big mistake, in my opinion.

i agree..lexie
he would be best served with deneying
he has anything in mind with leading..

[at this time]..supporting the peoples choice

he should call for harmony
not unthinking obediance..to the faceless few..[if only we knew]

he should call for reform[openness]etc
im not ready to watych him carry out a bag
[after the flood..from a highrise..12 feet high
through knee dep water..

and juliars voice
is so much like fingernails..
lectruring down a moral black board..[with the faceless few writing her script]...and her doing as she is told..

anyhow..rudd would be wrong to run
he needs to bring reform..so the party is run
by those elected..representing the electors..

not any to big to fail corperate
special intrests...with the right mates in govt
let the flood come..[dont add to it..be a team player]

then do a war cabnet,,formed of the die hards..
[the current vocal supporters of both]
that must replace..the faceless few...
in the media...

and in the leaders mind
serve for the greater common good
not the elite faceless few..[hiding their spoil
in family trusts]..

[can 'the richest woman..
actually be rich..if her riches..are in the familie trust?]

is the trustee the trust
juliatr thinks she is the trust
rudd fels he is the trustee..but they are no different
from any other elite..

[selfish and self serving]..
perty party show pony loyalists..to their own ego/party/adgenda

not the common charity
under the common weal
common-wealth

not all for one
im/done

God help Australia.

What a choice the people of Australia have. Julia, Rudd, Brown, Abbott.

We're really stuffed now.

Time to vote for an alternate Party. Any Party but this lot of Loony Tunes. From an Athiest... God help us!

If Kevin Rudd is not now and in the past, better than Gillard I am blind.
So too are the Australian people,who poll in numbers from 66% to 80% for him.
Abbott is the only chance if Gillard survives.
If she leads ON Tuesday, my party has dropped all views it wants reform.
And that it wants Victory.

Dear Belly,

Do you really believe that Mr Rudd will be able to
get rid of the influence of the factions?