The Forum > General Discussion > Insult to all Australians
Insult to all Australians
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
Posted by Andreas Berg', Saturday, 28 January 2012 9:24:01 AM
| |
Dear Andreas,
I looked up Australian legislation and International Law regarding violent behaviour on the web. It puts things into some historical perspective: "Until recent years, racist policies and practices were embedded within Australian laws and institutions. The most telling examples of these were the removal of Aboriginal children from their families and the denial of full citizenship rights to Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people. Similarly, the White Australia policy aimed to restrict immigration by people from non-European backgrounds. Historically, rises in unemployment have often led to calls for immigration restrictions and in some cases led to the scapegoating of people who were seen to be different to members of the dominant culture." "While legislation now exists to protect the rights of all citizens, there is a continuing legacy today from the effects of these racist practices. Contemporary expressions of racism which have emerged in recent years relate to notions of nationhood which are seen as incompatible with diversity. These racist beliefs may be expressed in various stereotyped views of who the "real" Australians are." "For the original inhabitants, Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people - who were dispossessed of their land and were discriminated against by the first British and European settlers the process of colonisation has been perceived as invasion. It didn't help matters that racial discrimination has continued to influence their lives in the two centuries following white settlement." "However having said all that - Australian laws as they stand today make it illegal for people to incite or permit violent acts to occur. Some people mistakenly believe that public expression of violent behaviour are legal and an acceptable form of free speech. In Australia, as internationally, the right to freedom of speech carries with it certain responsibilities and restrictions which protect the rights of others against open hostility." Aborginal leaders were right to condemn the behaviour that took place on Australia Day. A peaceful demonstration is one thing - but violent behaviour is not acceptable and does much harm to their cause. Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 28 January 2012 10:43:31 AM
| |
I would rather he flag be burnt than wrapped around some drunk yobbo on Australia day or waved in my face by a moron.
Posted by Bugsy, Saturday, 28 January 2012 11:00:40 AM
| |
Getting away from flag waving ninny's was my goal this Australia day Andreas.
Taking note of how many people around you in your neighborhood adorn their cars with flags on Australia day is a good way of determining how dumb your neighborhood is. The mere fact that Aboriginals have taken over 200 years to publicly defy the Australian flag, shows you just how civilised they really are. People arriving from oppression as immigrants also feel the need to wave flags and are second only to brainwashed and bigoted Americans. Wherever your from Andreas please don't express your patriotism in such a small minded way. Just anglo-size your name. It's a lot better way to defend your self from the other flag waving bigots who would see the indigenous inhabitants of our country hung from the yard arm for any excuse they could find anyway. Your only encouraging them Andreas. Posted by thinker 2, Saturday, 28 January 2012 11:16:55 AM
| |
Whatever happened to free-speech? Tony Abbott expressed a view about the tent embassy. From what I can ascertain from the media reports, his views were passed on to people at the event in a manner that conflated his words into a message that he was about to come and personally evict people and their belongings from the tent embassy. The events that occurred outside the Lobby cafe and at parliament house on 27 Jan, seemed more to be about people living in the past rather than embracing the many avenues we all have for expressing views and seeking change. Perhaps Andrew Bolt has a valid point in his article "Day of shame shows why we must stop this racial charade" From: Herald Sun January 27, 2012 12:00AM http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/day-of-shame-shows-why-we-must-stop-this-racial-charade/story-e6frfifx-1226254760404
Posted by Xpree, Saturday, 28 January 2012 11:31:47 AM
| |
We are continually being told by those of the aboriginal industry that we should learn how to manage Oz from the aborigines.
Well one thing they knew well was how to use the fire stick, to clear rubbish. The greenies would have stopped it if they had been around, but with out white mans law, our first settlers would have given them a hit on the head, & thrown them into the river. Just clearing more rubbish. They knew that you don't want noxious weeds, & useless junk taking over any previously useful area. They chucked a fire stick into such infestations quick time. Well that "tent embassy" is definitely a pile of junk, The aborigines would have put a fire stick to it about 39.5 years ago, & that's what we should do today. We sure are slow learners. Posted by Hasbeen, Saturday, 28 January 2012 11:45:55 AM
|
Burning Australian flag and dividing Australians on the basis of their ethnic background must be viewed as one of the most serious crimes.
I am calling on relevant authorities to employ the fullest power of law in such cases.