The Forum > General Discussion > Pacific Hwy Politics vs Truth
Pacific Hwy Politics vs Truth
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
However, those wonderful roads have a couple of flaws: firstly, they make the wheels emit a low-frequency hum which is very monotonous. They do that because they are "raked" to produce a slightly grooved surface in order to maintain grip in wet conditions. Second, they are white surfaces that reflect a huge amount of glare. Third, they are long straight runs, with few turns.
All of these things encourage fatigue. The tyre drone is like a white-noise generator, the glare makes one's eyes want to close and the long straight sections mean there's little concentration being applied to the task of driving in the first place.
As a result, there have been lots of single-vehicle rollovers on that highway when drivers have simply passed out and driven off the road.
A lot of it has since been resurfaced with asphaltic concrete, which was always part of the long-term plan, since the concrete settles in service and needs to be reprofiled to create a smooth road. That has improved the situation, at least in terms of the glare and the noise.
My point is that even the best roads (the Hume is designed to carry 1000+ 90t trucks per night) can have hidden faults that cause driver fatigue.