The Forum > General Discussion > Higher education
Higher education
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
As individual points out, many jobs are now requiring of Degrees when it really is not necessary.
I have two journalist friends now in their late 50s who entered into newspapers from the floor up, one as a cadet requiring good marks in Yr 12 especially for English and the other as a copy boy. Now we have Communications Degrees for aspiring journos and PR people but it has done little to increase the standards of reporting.
Getting a Degree is not essential but the way education is being forced into business models before long a Degree will be needed for many jobs which do not require that level of education. And please note education is very different to intelligence or smarts.
Simply put I think it is about horses for courses ('scuse the cliche') - pushing everything into a tertiary model only devalues higher education and devalues anything that remains in the non-tertiary sector IMO.
I understand that some jobs evolve over time. Nursing is probably one area that moved from work based training to university, due to advances in medical technology and research, but even in that sphere I wonder if a more clinical approach would be best.
Getting back to gender, I think statistics don't tell the whole story and people/groups may manipulate the statistics to their own end. For example there are more women in the Commonwealth APS now than men (only by a few percent) but there are more men represented in senior roles, while more women sit in middle management or lower end roles. So on the face of it some people might say the workforce is 'feminised' but is it really based on the full facts?
Same with university entry statistics which might not reflect the end outcomes considering factors like child rearing.