The Forum > General Discussion > Australia's refugee intake increased to 20 000 per annum
Australia's refugee intake increased to 20 000 per annum
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
----
Thanks Belly.
Yes the 20 000 is just an aspiration.
I’m not sure the Malaysian deal would have achieved much. Reopening Nauru and Manus Island would have been the go.
----
<< Labor, has not got a hope in hell of stopping the onshore asylum seeking scam--not now, or in any foreseeable permutation.>>
I can’t see that the situation is this hopeless, SPQR. The majority desire of the Australian votership is to stop the boats. Both the Labs and Libs say they want to do this. Howard showed that it could be done. So….. why can’t Labor damn well do it??
Gee, if they don’t, and Abbott promises to do so, they’ll be out on their ear at the next election!
<< What we will see will not be 20,000 off-shores and zero on-shores.
But 20,000 off-shores and the same number (as now), or more, of on-shores. >>
Yes quite likely. But crikey, I hope not.
----
<< What about the 60,000 illegal refugees (presumably by plane)? >>
Lexi, it goes without saying that I very strongly desire to see that clamped right down on.
In fact, that should be part of the deal. Minister Bowen should make sure it happens BEFORE there is any increase in the offshore refugee intake.
Now, all the good humanitarian people that want to help asylum seekers / refugees should be jumping right behind Chris Bowen and supporting this increase all the way. But as part of the deal, they’ve got to also be pushing for our border protection laws to be respected and for onshore asylum seeking and fly-in visa overstaying to be curtailed forthwith.