Antiseptic, while I mostly agree there are those on the right who use such a high level of vitreol in their posts that it looks like an attempt to silence disenting vioces. A different tactic to achieve the same end.

Those who were fond of threatening legal action against others tended to nominally right wing views on a lot of issues as well.

What is great about this side is that there are a variety of people with differing views who seem to be able to discuss issues without trying to shut down opposing views or playing gang up's.

R0bert

Fair comment R0bert, that particular group was very confused generally, though.

Dear RObert,

I think you may appreciate this joke...
I Googled it.

"Deductive reasoning is a lot simpler than many people
realize. Just see if it isn't.

Neighbour 1: "Hi there, new neighbour, it sure is a
mighty nice day to be moving."

New Neighbour: "Yes it is and people around here seem
extremely friendly."

Neighbour 1: "So what is it you do for a living?"

New Neighbour: "I'm a professor at the university. I teach
deductive reasoning."

Neighbour 1: " Deductive Reasoning, what is that?"

New Neighbour: "Let me give you an example. I see you have
a dog house out back. By that I deduce that you have a dog."

Neighbour 1: "That is right."

New Neighbour: "The fact that you have a dog leads me to
deduce that you have a family."

Neighbour 1: "Right again."

New Neighbour: "Since you have a family, I deduce that you
have a wife."

Neighbour 1: "Correct."

New Neighbour: "And since you have a wife, I can deduce that
you are heterosexual."

Neighbour 1: "Yup."

New Neighbour: "That is deductive reasoning."

Neighbour 1: "Cool."

Later that same day:

Neighbour 1: "Hey, I was talking to the new guy who
moved in next door."

Neighbour 2: "Is he a nece guy?"

Neighbour 1: "Yes and he has an interesting job."

Neighbour 2: "Oh yeah, what does he do?"

Neighbour 1: "He's a Professor of Deductive Reasoning at
the University."

Neighbour 2: "Deductive Reasoning, what's that?"

Neighbour 1: "Let me give you an example. Do you have a
dog house?"

Neighbour 2: "No."

Neighbour 1: "Fag."

The way many of the 'elistist left ' or new atheist would like it is to ban the bible and promote the porn industry even though it has been biblical belief that has enabled them to freely have their vile opinion.

Dear runner,

The Chinese philosopher Lao Tsu thought that life could
be seen and explained in terms of a circle. Nothing was
new, but nothing stayed the same. You always ended up in
the same place, although you could be further ahead than
when you started. Sounds familiar doesn't it? Like the
authors of astrology guides in the daily newspapers, Lao
wasn't taking any chances. But he had a point.

Your ideas
about "elitist lefts," and others, share a similar quality. They
contain nothing new. You say the same thing over and
over again and you end up back in the same position as you
began. Ah well, some people may be impressed by your myth
creation, and repetition while others may find your philosophy
rather difficult to swallow.

Lexi

your ideas about Abbott

'about Äbbott" and others, share a similar quality. They
contain nothing new. You say the same thing over and
over again and you end up back in the same position as you
began. Ah well, some people may be impressed by your dislike, and repetition while others may find your philosophy
rather difficult to swallow. '

you might say things a little nicer but underneath your rusted on views have not changed anymore than my views or philosophy.