The Forum > General Discussion > Malaysia Solution or Disaster
Malaysia Solution or Disaster
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 21 September 2011 6:56:48 PM
| |
Lexi,
How can you and other Labor tragics say that Nauru didn't work when all the evidence is clear that it did? Is this because you either swallow Juliar's line that Malaysia is better, or you would simply like thousands more in detention in Aus and hundreds dying at sea? Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 23 September 2011 10:01:33 AM
| |
SM,
Sorry, not interested. We've been over this ground and you know the answers and the facts, or you should. As long as you keep on repeating the vacuous spin of your party - I simply can't take you seriously. I don't care to interact with you at all. Posted by Lexi, Friday, 23 September 2011 11:07:18 AM
| |
Lexi, you will be quite with in your rights to tell me off.
But yes for you, and me conversing with shadow Minister is unwise and time wasting. He again and again calls us such as Labor tragic, but my honestly held view one of two things drive the man. A total inability to see or under stand truth. Or a desperate need to ignore it at all costs http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/immigration/two-new-asylum-seeker-vessels-test-labors-troubled-boats-policy/story-fn9hm1gu-1226144422313 This link, all reporting today highlights distortions. ABC ten minutes ago reporter if this boat was in Indonesian waters why was it not turned back. Ministers and said, it was in Indonesia's rescue waters not territorial, the ships captain has right to name port Christmas island was far closer. Same question same answer asked minutes after. Two female reports asked how can you say Nehru will not work if you have not tried it? They unlike Shadow Minister would be unaware, after all their job is to ask silly question hoping to start a fight, High court judgment , in the view of the very same people who advised Ruddock and Howard, HIGHT COURT RULING WIPES EVERY PAST WAY OUT. never FORGET!Abbott wants, with no agreement to tow t hem back too Indonesea! Shadow Minister finally I can muster up the inner strength to say our last good by, talking to you is pointless truth can not sway you your slanders not me farewell bloke! The Little man defames LIBERALISM! Posted by Belly, Friday, 23 September 2011 12:09:18 PM
| |
Dear Belly,
SM can believe whatever he wants. Frankly I could care less. What I've reacted to in the past is the total nonsense he espouses. As I've told him previously he's entitled to his opinions but not his facts. And frankly I've lost all interest in engaging in any sort of discussions with him. Posted by Lexi, Friday, 23 September 2011 1:08:43 PM
| |
Lexi,
" We've been over this ground and you know the answers and the facts" Too right. In the 3 years prior to the pacific solution there were nearly 10000 boat people arrivals, compared to the 3 years prior to the removal of the pacific solution when there were less than 250. When Rudd took office there were 6 people in detention and now there are 5000. Of those going to Nauru, 75% were determined to be genuine refugees of which 43% were settled in Australia. These are the rock solid facts. Perhaps you would care to explain how the Pacific solution did not work. I think you are in La la land. Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 23 September 2011 2:07:37 PM
|
N, Na, Nau, Naur, Nauru - certainly won't stop the boats.
It didn't work then, and it won't work now.