The Forum > General Discussion > Lyne to get shot of Oakeshott.
Lyne to get shot of Oakeshott.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 27 August 2011 11:08:44 AM
| |
Lexi,
You haven't offered any sources for your opinion. Why is the research group wrong? Or are you just stamping your foot in a hissy fit? All you can say is that because I am a coalition supporter every thing I say is wrong and the links to respected research groups must be a fabrication. Perhaps Juliar grasping power was good for the coalition, in that it stripped labor of any last shred of credibility or decency, and the next election will see Federal labor go the way of NSW labor. Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 27 August 2011 1:21:22 PM
| |
I actually live as close as you can get to the mans electorate as you can get, without being in it.
I gave truth and balance , not wanted here but true still. Remember,take note, only few of us come here looking for other than comments that support our biases. One day, unlikely from my opponents here in this thread, understanding may come. It must be considered,this non conservative, like Windsor, mirroring in fact Windsors career, won in a landslide seats others once held. And won it from them. Had they, in the exposed view of some here, went the other way, put Abbott in the lodge, to deal with the greens, they would be considered brave and just men. Australian Politics needs better, from both sides. It can not expect that from these blind gentlemen. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 27 August 2011 2:09:14 PM
| |
SM,
No I'm not having a hissy fit. But you really take the cake. You ask for a source? OK. How about the one YOU gave yourself in your opening post? That should be good enough for you shoudln't it? http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sydney-nsw/poll-shocker-for-mp-rob-oakeshot-as-support-plunges/story-e6freuzi-1226122437449 You in your opening post did not mention the details that I picked up on in my subsequent posts (wonder why?). The article in the Daily Telegraph makes it quite clear, and I quote: "Mr Oakeshott hit back last night saying the Port Poll was biased. The Editor still worked for a National Party MP... The Editor of the Port Paper is on the Parliamentary Staff Lists as an employee of the National Party's MP - Luke Hartsuyker..." "Mr Oakeshott has referred the paper (which was started in March) to the NSW Electoral Commission and the Press Council." I don't make things up - there's other sources available with this information on the web, as you well know. Which makes one wonder about the figures quoted in the Port Poll. As a reader commented, "Is that 14.8% or 14.8 people." We all know how your Party has trouble with numbers and percentages. Posted by Lexi, Saturday, 27 August 2011 3:07:15 PM
| |
Lexi,
I know you don't want to hear this but the research was not done by the paper but by an independent research company " Australian market research company ReachTEL". Irrespective of the affiliation of the paper the research is solid. Oakeshott is gone by 2014. Posted by Shadow Minister, Saturday, 27 August 2011 5:24:53 PM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-day-abbott-bared-his-soul-20110827-1jfgv.html
An interesting read. Some will say from a paper that is tainted. And refuse to see the real nature of the people involved including Tony Abbott. I fear for this country. If, and in my view it is not, this paper is slanted what then of the Murdock Media? Yes look at the failures of Labor. But not using a magnifying glass. Not in a fun fair mirror distorting the image. Just except,assisted by Labors internal self interests, the spin has done its job. Conservatives will win the next elect. Now that is settled. Look now at Tony Abbott, his front bench. If Gillard lied, Abbott breaths them in and out in his every breath, as do some of his supporters. What future this country? our seconds run it, and will run it. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 28 August 2011 5:07:50 AM
|
"They'll still be in denial after they've lost
the election."
You got that right - Tony Abbott and Co.,
are certainly in denial!
SM,
You can twist and turn - all you like -
you have no credibility whatsoever -
and neither does the party you support.
I stand by what I've posted - and it came
from credible sources - so say whatever you
want the facts stand - as does your continued
propaganda which is fooling nobody.
Anyway, I wasted enough of my valuable time
on your nonsense (which is all it is).
In future I simply shan't bother. You're not
interested in anything other than the usual
condemnations which as far as I'm concerned
have earned themselves a place on my
"to ignore." You and your cheerleaders are
welcomed to preach to each other.
Cheers.