http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/blogs/wokkapedia/a-disgrace-to-democracy-not-even-close-20110823-1j833.html
Love them ,hate them, some believe them.
Do shock Jocks have a duty to stay within reach of the truth?
Are they accountable for what they say, should they be.
A parliamentarian must say what may involve self interest in matters before them.
Should shock Jockes and commentators have to reveal their affiliations.

Belly that takes the cake. Even the ABC does not go that far in justifying the unjustifiable.

It is one thing to stop a protest from showing just how large it is, it is another to then use the cooperation of the protesters to then try to belittle them, by claiming it was less than it was. It is a pity for Oz that the convoy was not manned by Frenchmen. They would still be blockading parliament house.

Then we get the article by this left Toddy hack journalist, which is probably counterproductive. All this cr4p does is reinforce the disgust of average people for Labor politics. The disgusting Richardson has been left far in the wake of this lot.

Then to have you praising this behaviour shows every thinking person just how low Labor supporters have got. It is not only a snake or a worm what would have trouble getting lower, even a microbe couldn't get down there.

You lot must be really desperate to share Julia's crown for biggest liar ever with anyone you think you can. Another huge lie doesn't achieve that desire.

Belly,

Even Shock Jocks are challenged when making falsehoods. However, they are free to state their opinions, even when it differs from your "truth".

I rest my case Hasbeen.

Pure arrogance, lies and contempt for ordinary Australians.
And then the despicable disciples come out in force to protect their gangsta masters, it's a disgrace and an insult of the highest order.

Not happy Jan!

witness how the left side of the media abuse their power, and ours are just as bad!

"MSNBC's Ed Schultz Selectively Edits Video To Make Perry Look Racist"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0CRpjPJOEIE

My three detractors.
How do I say this?
Can I say this.
Hasbeen you I can except as ok.
I do not look to any of you for comments that are balanced understanding or even true.
PWEW!
GOT OUT OF THAT!
A shock jock! is in my view a performer, an actor and owns no duty to truth, have you blokes considered it as a job prospect?
The link was not my words, such links exist to many more such story's, I can find not one supporting Alan.
Can you.
Shock jocks plan to? shock.
This one is a former maybe current speech writer for the Liberals.
Unfortunately, far too many, read this thread, believe shock jocks.
Far too many do not question the uttering and mutterings of them.
The highlighted link, look at it, told of a lie a known deliberate lie.
My detractors give no weight to truth.
Is it true.
Is it ok to lie because your cause is popular.
YESTERDAY your leader Abbott was quoted in the house he said *the public does not need to know some things*
My country bleeds,it suffers, because SOME consider any lie can be used against one side.
I offer this thread as it now stands as evidence we have no longer got any intention to even consider those words that once meant so much
Fair Go Mate!