noting that an oath..CREATED your persons
[ie you app-LIED..for a licence]
YOU swore the info true and correct[in writting[ie an oath]

law is based on bennifit
presuming we wont apply for a lower[under *standing]
than we are entitled to

thus if you think being a person under the act
means your under the act..why does your licence get suspended?

we ARNT persons
never should have lied..[applied..ie begged]
thats what applied means

but the true law isnt taught
it is tort[civil statute]..only applying over corperate fictions

criminal law is the only true law
to compensate a victim

the dead cant be hurt
thus cant be victim[cant claim victim higherr *standing

yet the first question judges ask you
do you UNDER *stand

no your honour
there is no victim

and i cant swear anything true or faulse

""we constantly kick our politicians.
But this is sections
at the very top
of those we trust to defend us.""

too true mr bell
as most are or were layers
THE SHOULD KNOW BETTER..!

when we 'vote'..we are creating a situation of trust
we are appointing 'a trustee'..to handle govt matters 'on our behalf'

thus by voting underr the act
we stand 'under'..the act[which being dead]
implies we are mind dead

[and need to elect an elect..
to care for us legal imbisiles]

BUT THEY HAVE A LAWFULL 'duty of care"

the same applies in court
when we are so incompitant[the legal term is imbisile]
so as to require a trustee to speak for us]

just as a dead corperation[a person]..needs a living being..to 'speak'..on 'its' behalf

its simple to grasp
once you realise only imbisiles claim to be a person

[note a dead 'person]..is written in capital letters
because now its dead
living beings write in red[blood red]
royals write in purple ink

corperation in black ink[to signify they arnt living]
and sick people are recorded in blue ink

""A good and honest cop
is worth far more than we could ever afford to pay them.""

yes thats why we got ignorants
enforcing 'policy'..instead of law
by threat of force

but the court should know better
but even there its run by people with no clue of true law
[thats why hell is full of lawyers/judges]
recall jesus said about judging 'others'

them wearing wigs and dresses should have been a clue
""Increasingly it is hard to tell one from the other.""

not really
it simply needs be taught in school
failing to do so is willfull negligence

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/james-murdoch-set-for-recall-by-commons-over-phone-hacking-scandal/story-e6frg996-1226116351376
This too fits my claims.
They are that power/ Privilege/cronyism/ and the ability to reward for service, can buy the law.
Not yet over but from the very heart of this groups Australian flagship it, at least, highlights a difference in attitude of those who fit one of the descriptions.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/16/phone-hacking-now-reporter-letter
This link too expresses my views about the law power and privilege.
It printed at the same time as the link to the Australian,informs us that first link, is heavily edited.
Much was not printed, while thread did not get an audience it in my view warns us all, be aware.
Media is little more than some ones self interest printed as news.
I am more than interested what the future will bring after this emerging scandal changes media forever, it will do that!

Just mention the sexual differences in sentencing, particularly when the children's welfare card is played, I'm sure Anti will join in...

As to when will it stop?

Who knows? The "church" sold indulgences, the ancient temples accepted nice big fat offerings from wrongdoers, kings pardoned culpable robber-barons who nonetheless served the interests of the king.

will it stop? not for thousands of years, at least.

Rusty

I think RC I killed the thread with an off the cuff remark about the Masons.
That even if they are slowly dieing is unwise in a forum that has middle to high income earners for the most part.
But adds a log to my fire.
We toss and turn on lies politicians use like toilet paper, everyday,
But seem unconcerned at the fact,justice truly is blind.
Not in the way it claims, but blind to the crimes of some.
5 months in prison! for a mum sleeping ,for taking stolen goods, fixed now.
But after a week in prison and some do not get that much time for fraud involving thousands?