Antiseptic,by electrolyisis hydrogen can be used as it is created.There is not need to store it,hence it is actually safer than petrol or gas.This system just needs to be improved.So far I've got a 12% increase in fuel efficiency.Apparently after this system I've bought is broken in,it can produce 25% improvement in efficiency.This has been produced by very basic simple technology.It works.Why haven't the big manufacturers improved this system?Could it be the influence of the oil companies?

Arjay, if you're running your engine 12% leaner you are also running it a great deal hotter. Watch out that you don't burn out pistons, valves etc and that the rings have enough lubricant not to sieze. An upper-cylinder lube of some kind would be the go.

You'll also have some timing problems and you'll probably need to run colder plugs.

Just how much hydrogen are you adding?

Arjay,
I just watched your hero Dr Evans. What a dishonest and disturbing diatribe! Did you even look him up before placing your faith in this man?

He's not a climatologist and has never published in a peer-reviewed climate journal, he belongs to right-wing think tanks, he's mainly published and promoted by Denialist think tanks like the Lavoisier Group, he's not a 'rocket scientist' as he claims to be, and he was not even a climate modeller! Instead he has a Phd in electrical engineering, not climate science or modelling. Ooops.
http://www.desmogblog.com/who-is-rocket-scientist-david-evans

However regarding his claims, Dr Barry Brook — Professor of the climate change department of Adelaide University and pro-nuclear advocate — says:

< (1) the hotspot was not a signature of the greenhouse effect – it is a signature of warming from any source,
and (2) that the hotspot is not actually missing… >
http://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/10/dr-david-evans-born-again-alarmist/

once again, Oooops! But that’s what you get when you place your anti-science faith in non-climatologists.

How does Professor Brook sum up Dr Evan’s behaviour? If you look carefully, Barry says Dr Evans uses a DSS attack!

< Despite this revelation and other careful countering of his claims, Dr Evans chose to simply ignore these corrections and repeat himself on ABC 891 radio in Adelaide. This led me to a point-by-point explanation, on the same radio show, the next week, describing where Dr Evans was in error. Both interviews are podcast here for audio download.
Surely then, Dr Evans must now, in his words, once again “be an alarmist again instead of a skeptic” (apparently there is no middle ground). No? Unsurprisingly, he deploys the standard non-greenhouse theorist approach of yet again blithely ignoring any refutation and simply repeating the exactly the same arguments again in a third forum. So, yet again, a climate scientist had to patiently refute this.
Perhaps Dr Evans doesn’t understand that whilst everyone is entitled to their own opinion, they are not entitled to their own facts. >
http://bravenewclimate.com/2008/08/10/dr-david-evans-born-again-alarmist/

Ludwig if you go to http://www.themileshop.com you can see all the details.I don't believe the all of the claims of these companies make.The scrubber or filter needs to be improved.Sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) is the electrolyte and this is very corrosive.The version I have is supposed to produce 3 litres per minute

I will know in a couple of weeks how effective it is.