For the second time today I leave a thread I started in the best interests of OLO.
Fair minded posters may find for me inmy last 25 posts, more if you wish, refferences to this combatative poster.
A similar search of her posts, distant past and present, may conclude the issue.
I did get it right, in my view it always has and will be impossible for this person to leave things alone.
A search, going back to threads named car park will be informative for newcomers.
Note I ignored the comment in the law is an ass but it anoys to know I will need to ignore a great deal more.

Belly I might be missing something but I think that you are over reacting. I'm trying to avoid regurgitating specifics of earlier times or naming names.

I wasn't aware of the exchange you were having when I made the earlier post but in a brief scan of recent posts I've not seen the extreme's or tactics that marked that earlier period. It's clear that the poster is posting as an individual, not in the name of an organisation. Nor have I seen posts which would give cause for genuine complaint within the context of the normal to and fro of OLO.

Be cautious that history does not make you see offence that's not necessarily there and don't allow it to create unnecessary conflict you don't want.

Cheers
R0bert

Thank you RObert.
Bloke done all that
truly never convicted any one in my life.
I am convinced the DNA is the same intent is the same, time will prove me right or wrong but watch the style closely in the coming weeks.
My radar has not let me down here.

*Stalking is by the way the word I would use in relation to that name changer.
Posted by Belly, Friday, 17 June 2011 6:07:42 AM*

Advise & nothing more. Comments as above / posted all through.
You&I*have disclosed a link to a organization &i''m not ashamed.
Wiser eyes& friends might advise you not to make foolish childish allegations.

Saying silly things reflects on you & people lose respect.
I say this like a mother not anger.
When i joined olo you attacked. That was my welcome& yes it upset me.
I acted quickly and openly.
I posted my number so you could ask anything you wanted.
I was concerned deeply about your allegations $ how it might effect me (given I posted my real name and address + number.)
You replied saying I might later.
What i learnt was years ago the owner said members could use one tag because they joined as an institution. This seemed to be a great problem for u.
That didnt give anybody *more posts. It was just their choice& a part being members all contributed to the institution costs. So they felt they *all should have the opportunity to post under that name tag.) Like u use ALP I note"

I didnt have to disclose being a member. I just wanted to be honest.

I think you behave a little paranoid sometimes. Nobody is / was stalking you&sure as eggs have more important things to do.

I am passionate about banning live exports& thats why I post here under my real name. Not some made up name- mine! I am dammed if I do& Dammed if I dont.

No wonder they left. Your not going to chase me away& thats final.
I have done nothing wrong/broken no rules/& your not the boss thank God. Apart from animals, I come here to relax -thats all& kerryanne is certainly not following u either here or in real life, or anybody else.
I hope thats the end of this.

Belly, I'd rather give Kerryanne the benefit of the doubt, if you are correct then that will show in time. In the mean time take things at face value and see what comes.

Kerryanne, "What i learnt was years ago the owner said members could use one tag because they joined as an institution. This seemed to be a great problem for u."

I'm trying to work out how to respond to that without re-opening an old debate. Given you've already hit flack from that history it may be worth you knowing some of the other side of that.

For the moment can I make it clear that what you've been told is a massive misrepresentation of how many others saw the issue.

For a quick summary try my posts at http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=989#17543 and http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=989#17579

A post by Ginx also is worth noting http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=989#17561

Cheers
R0bert

Hi Robert,
I read the links u posted &more. Your comments were fair but they did join as a member institute. Like u, not trying bring up past. &have no control. I know when those people joined it was to posted under the name of the institution group/i;m not. It was the way it was done . What i just read was people being abused for following the rules they were given at that time. If u stop to be fair, &u seem a fair man to me u must agree they couldn't have got any more posts than the others.If u feel i should see something else know i really looked. I just cant. & I think they got a raw deal.1500 $ they paid. I 'know that myself, as a member. &i think ( &i;m being honest) that your buddy was the problem then&i know its the trouble for me &my posts now. I get stuck it to it fighting for animals but 100% I did go out of my way to be nice. I think u have a friend with some problems Robert.&I removed my number after another poster warned me.If u really want to know after reading some comments & the consistent attacks i was very scared because i gave my address +number. I wont ever do that again.pale have done wonderful work&i'm proud to be a member but I;m just Kerry here. Not getting involved in anything else &i debate it as tough as the next for animals but i dont break rules.
Sorry i dont see what u see. I see a unwell person &I did my best.