OUG:

...Just to conform to your theories OUG, I dare predict the carbon tax is intended to raise funds to compensate the “sea changers” who bought all that beautifully overpriced real estate along the sea fronts of Australias front-line to rising sea levels. Maybe it will be used to compensate Banks for defaulted mortgages in flood areas of Brisbane: Or Insurance companies, to support their tireless efforts in maintaining their profit margins and dividend payments to shareholders, through thick and thin, by using the tried and trusted method of refusing pay-out on policy claims; and to the facilitation by our weak Government, allowing them to escape scott-free, while fellow Australians dig deep to help the real victims of crime, the “BIG”flood victim.

...Or the “BIGGER” crime of ripping off every motorist in Australia for green slip insurance; making huge windfall profits at $500.00 per vehicle pa, and giving token payments, such as a miserable $15K for two arms amputated above the wrist, or two legs amputated above the ankle, from a road accident. Or, if blinded in two eyes, $20K, but if blinded in one eye, then no payment at all. And a “BIG” thank you to Government for supporting the insurance industry, and assisting them to escape scott-free from this scam, by taxing the motorist an extra $100 pa for a levy, raising much needed money to contribute real and beneficial compensation to the victims of road accidents.

...Thank you, from the Insurance industry of Australia, to the “BIG” Australian, the tax payer

continuing with the small thinking/big theme
i note todays reveal..mr mike doors..

[the lobbiest who lobbied for the current smoking issue...
who in fact who drafted the legislation..then lobbied govt
the oppositrion went for it first...then labor picked it up]

its intresting as
its the root..of the removal of trademark legislation
he is the 'public-face' of the 'preventive health task force'

and what i find intersting is how they have lobbied for the change
as well as writting the legislation..[yet now dislike..those they declare war on..actually doing the same they did...;ie lobby govt]

its funny..wonder how much
'preventive health task!FORCE"..gives to both parties
yet complain about others doing the same...

he was intervieuwed[abc],..still lobbying
and the funny thing i thought was...first the smokers..next the boozers..next the lollies[diabetics.and fatties]

but on second thought..HOW MUCH ARE THEY PAYING HIM
to just concentrate on smoking..[ie look at them..but not us others]

[WHO..in fact who shall be next?]...
if any...!

NOTING they are 'about tasking HEALTH..not just smokers..
smokers is either..just to get/set the precedent...or as the pretence to be acting for 'health..when its just about smokers]

they must realise..this has been done step by step

[disinfranchise the media intrest..by removing their right to advertise..then set up the anti-smoking groups in the same media privledged position...media allways serve those who give it $$$$]

it goes much further..if in fact it is about ALL health issues
the thin end of the wedge...[ie mike says only two industry groups now one in londan..the other in newyork]...thus the reasoning behind john howard owning shares..via the public servant trust fund

to first drive the industry into...

oh heck why bother

comeon death..hurry up
life is ccccrap..people expected
heaven...lol..on earth
and get hell

and your its next meal