CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MULR/2006/27.html

//The Victorian Charter of Rights is the first bill of rights to be enacted by an Australian state. It is a limited change to the law that does not disturb accepted principles of parliamentary sovereignty and does not confer powers associated with the United States Bill of Rights, such as that of courts to STRIKE DOWN down legislation//

COMPARE WITH.

http://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/CA256902000FE154/Lookup/residential_tenancies_list/$file/director_of_housing_v_sudi.pdf

ORDER (from VCAT)

2. The director.... acted UNLAWFULLY.

I dispute that the Director had to give reasons...because those reasons were clear to Sudi.. he was not paying rent..and didnt have a rental agreement and he knew it.

Sovereignty eh?

Laws made by parliament

Are Australian

Good point Pericles- no arguments there.

@ Shintaro

In the same way that

laws "made by" Louis 16th

were “sovereign” French law(s).

People....lend me your eyes...

We all have sufficient IQ to know how 'things are done'.
A billboard "looks" like we are just advertizing a Buick, when in fact the advertiser is tapping into our primal urges. By putting a hot bikini (un)Clad chick on the sign with the Buick.

IN THE SAME WAY....the so called "public consultation" carried out by the supposedly high powered impartial committee was a complete scam where the outcome was pre-determined.

TIMELINE

2002 LABOR ELECTED. See Bracks 'Platform' speech and you will not find a syllable about 'Charter of Human Rights'.

2004 Rob (mini AntiChrist/Stabshauptmann)Hulls brought up the idea of a Charter of Human Rights and responsibilities.

2005 a select committee is appointed to 'guage public opinion'

They contract out to AMNESTY (Hammer and Sickle) INTERNATIONAL who then contract to Morgan polling to see if people want 'more protection for human rights'.

To PRIME them..they show 2 tables. First table shows

"protection previously" (Prior to anti terrorism law) and they are asked some key questions.

Then..they are shown a second table. (Post Anti Terrorism law)
and asked the same questions.

Of course the QUESTIONS are rather loaded... nooooo surprise there.

Then... the good committee goes out interviewing 'many community organizations' such as... the..... "Youth Affairs Council of Victoria"..

oops.. which just happens to be FUNDED by the Victorian State government! ie... Mr Mini AntiChrist Stabshauptmann Hulls.

The AMNESTY funded survey... included the MASSIVE number of... wait for it.. 1001 Aussies. *WOW*..yep..that's representative.

Not much of a case for 'Democratic Process'

My conclusion.. *CLASSIC BERNAYS* SOCIAL ENGINEERING.

Say what you like, Boaz, it doesn't change a thing.

>>My conclusion.. *CLASSIC BERNAYS* SOCIAL ENGINEERING.<<

I know that Bernays is your (Beck-initiated) "thing" right now.

But whatever its provenance, the Victorian Government's Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 was enacted in Australia, by a democratically elected government.

"Which Law rules?, you asked.

The answer, however much you bluster, is "Australian law".

End of story.