The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Should we have a flood levy?

Should we have a flood levy?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. 20
  14. 21
  15. All
Sorry Shadow Minister, but not backing down, you are a person who has never had the ability to take what you serve up.
If I compiled a list of your put downs, well I will not bother.
See it is not cloths,cash property that makes the man.
It is not class or Church nore political party.
It is something you never had and never will, understanding.
I grew up in the rich mans town, holding your hat over your heart to talk to them was a requirement, I see you that way.
MANY conservatives live here, I respect all but three, I convict those three not with my words but theirs.
Yours convict you, you often talk of my inability to think.
Mate stop trying to out maneuver me in the court of verbal tennis, your one tracked view has you beaten in straight sets.
My views against yours leaves me content it seems clear you are unable to see other than your own views.
Posted by Belly, Thursday, 3 February 2011 2:23:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Abbott wants us to

Donate to the Libs, rather

Than pay the levy

http://tiny.cc/vngn0
Posted by Shintaro, Thursday, 3 February 2011 2:39:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Belly,

Your respect is not something I value or yearn for. Your rusted on loyalty to class system that no longer exists is at best quaint. I probably will never understand it, largely due to my upbringing where reason was valued over dogma, and partly due to the incomprehensibility of your posts.

Again your failure to substantiate any of your comments indicates that you have nothing to offer.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Thursday, 3 February 2011 3:37:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
At this point I should keep my word, to myself, not post avoid SM.
But why.
Vacate the Field off debate,run away, yes I nearly left OLO, others did.
See SM may well be a member of the opposition, and we took his ability to post some truly offensive thread titles as a well, leave it.
I am badly educated we know that,but is IQ related to education?
This morning my HONESTLY HELD VIEW ALP NSW asking me to spread the word was not unlike asking me to be a fertilizer spreader.
You NEVER will see a comment like that from Shadow minister.
I ask GY to stay out of this ring, under take not to flame,but if I can not take on such as SM here this forum is no longer the one I joined.
I CONFRONT until death inflexibility, inability to think of my country best interests not my party's, I forever oppose the idea that all the good comes from such as SM and his conservatives and the evil from my side of the fence.
Yes we should have a flood levee a cyclone levee a fire levee.
One day we may just retrieve the lost ground in Australian politics, judge issues not party's debate not flame each other.
I Shadow Minister am that boy now old who started work at age 13, have done many jobs the last two will be enough 22 years on the RTA NSW and then my years proudly as AWU official, no glory nothing to hide no need to be other than me.
Yet I claim a deeper broader understanding of politics than you, with confidence.
Posted by Belly, Friday, 4 February 2011 6:21:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Again,

Pure emotion. Not a jot of reason why you support a pile of random additional taxes, or why they would be in the country's interest.

That NSW Labor is a disaster is no secret, and agreeing with that view does not in any way make you unbiased. As for the other Labor policies, you adopt them as your own without even trying to consider the consequences.

You are as one eyed as me, the difference is I know why.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Friday, 4 February 2011 7:09:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A significant point came out in the media last night.
Some states take out insurance against natural disasters, the current Queensland government has chosen not to do so.

It's reported that Victoria has that insurance and that the damage to infrastructure in Victoria will be covered by their insurance. If that's the case then Victorian taxpayers will not only be paying for their own insurance but be paying extra taxes to cover the Queensland governments choice not to take out insurance.

R0bert
Posted by R0bert, Friday, 4 February 2011 9:43:08 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. 17
  11. 18
  12. 19
  13. 20
  14. 21
  15. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy