Poirot, your thread has like a thousand others highlighted this sad case.
thanks
May I ask those who have contributed so far to threads about Wikileaks and its founder to read this mornings Australian?
This some times comic book some time brilliant news paper, massively over loaded with a poor quality under achieving Editor has delivered a gem today.
In a reference to a Wikileaks leak to the Sydney morning herald we are reminded just how foul a swimming pool Diplomacy is .
The story tells us we know a living person who is responsible for the MURDER of those Australian news men.
It tells us both Indonesia and Australia are going to do nothing, in the name of.
Diplomacy.
Indonesia still torturing civilians still murdering still denying truth is more important to us for its proposed help in terrorism and controlling boat people than truth honesty and that is that.
Without Wikileaks we would not know this,are we Ostrich's? are we better for saying we do not want to know.
NEVER!

Forrest and Jewely,

This article appears related to the cable discussed earlier..from a Swedish perspective.

http://www.thelocal.se/30654/20101206/

Forest: “… but you really must learn to slow down to a pace at which you can do your own thinking, and avoid conflating things.”

You’re really my husband aren’t you Forest… that is exactly what you said when I suggested Autism was being caused by US vaccinations as an American feminist plot to eventually create a population of non-socially functioning males.

And this all means Sweden will continue with their trying to extradite him next month?

In the meantime the US will try passing a new law to get him after he goes to Sweden?

Is that conflating again?

Poirot:”It appears to suggest that the current "informal" arrangement is a way for Sweden and the U.S. to share intelligence data outside of the Swedish Government's scrutiny, regulation or restriction.”
This isn’t the Swedish government doing it?

Thanks for the other article about the Swedish, everything that comes up looks like politics vs law to me. Am I right that constitutions are laws?

I saw The Australian article Belly… not even sure what they were trying to say about him. To me it looks like a few sour grapes are emerging.

Emu’s Belly. :)

Belly I found it... I know, I never mentioned I was actually looking for it. Ironic that it is called Stockholm syndrome.

I went googling the wrong thing first… I had heard about post slavery traumatic syndrome although had forgotten the name but it didn’t fit -only applying to African descendants I discovered.

This is what I think we suffer from in general – Stockholm syndrome affects roughly 27% of people in captive situations, 27% is a big number when you are talking the population of entire countries. So I figure we do the Ostrich thing naturally.

“In psychology, Stockholm syndrome is a term used to describe a paradoxical psychological phenomenon wherein hostages express adulation and have positive feelings towards their captors that appear irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, essentially mistaking a lack of abuse from their captors as an act of kindness.”

boy talk about a murky topic
http://wn.com/%5BLEAKSPIN%5D_Secret_US-Sweden_Terrorist_Surveillance_Arrangements

that link simply refuses to open

this seems interesting
http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=2307

i..suppose this quote..covers a broken con-dom

They claim their agenda is
to stamp our heath fraud?

Is it really?

Fraud is Now in the Eyes of the Beholder

The FDA tells us that the top priority of this collaboration is enforcement action on fraudulent weight loss products, especially those promoted on the internet.

The FDA plans to trample the rights of American citizens with their campaign. The FDA, Canada, and Mexico plan to define fraud in violation of United States law.

Their definition: ?The false, deceptive, or misleading promotion, advertisement, distribution, sale, possession for sale, or offering for sale of products or provision of services,

intended for human use, that are represented as being safe and/or effective to diagnose, prevent, cure, treat, or mitigate disease (or other conditions),

to rehabilitate patients

or to provide a beneficial effect on health.?

nope im just not seeing it

ok this must be it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCy-HItcBu0

funny my web link is on the blink
boy dont that just make ya think

so what...if not truth...just what have we be-got..[not]