Thinker 2,

I meant to reply to your question more fully. Yes, I do believe that verbatim realtime footage/dialogue is better than embedded journalism.

We have all witnessed pictures that have been cropped, or 'changed' in some way - presenting a false idea of the situation. Also, we have witnessed pictures dragged from the 'morgue' and presented as current; ... even pictures which were taken elsewhere than at the stated site...

winstone smith...a white hat hacker
on alex jones show..[15th dec wed]..arround the 84 minute mark
http://www.infowars.com/audio/201012/201012.html

anyhow..the new plan is
to get people..to read the wikidocuments
and spam the info arround

he rebuts..the denial of service attacks..completly*

[thats what govt wants...not us]

anyhow activism..is doing the hard yards
reading 250,000 leaks..picking the best out of them
then publicizing...them*

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheAlexJonesChannel#p/search/1/7SN8JNAZSQo

sure we need..'hero's'...lol
but mostly..we need the workers

if they arnt...inspiring the workers...why have leaders?

its evolution...not..r-evolution
all we are saying is war is over...[if we want to]
give peace a chance...[change we can really believe in]

there is also the faulse..'prince of peace'...
spoken of in predictions..

i note wiki has gone quiet
since julians...'liberation'..

this helps me see credence in..the following quote

He is part of or running a limited hangout or honeypot.

A limited hangout, or partial hangout, is a public relations or propaganda technique that involves the release of previously hidden information in order to prevent a greater exposure of more important details.

It takes the form of deception, misdirection, or coverup often associated with intelligence agencies involving a release or “mea culpa” type of confession of only part of a set of previously hidden sensitive information, that establishes credibility for the one releasing the information who by the very act of confession appears to be “coming clean”

and acting with integrity; but in actuality, by withholding key facts, is protecting a deeper operation and those who could be exposed if the whole truth came out.

In effect, if an array of offenses or misdeeds is suspected, this confession admits to a lesser offense while covering up the greater ones....

like the fact the actual leaker..whistler..
is...still in soletary...is forgotten]

A limited hangout typically is a response to lower the pressure felt from inquisitive investigators pursuing clues that threaten to expose everything, and the disclosure is often combined with red herrings or propaganda elements that lead to false trails, distractions, or ideological disinformation;

thus allowing covert or criminal elements to continue in their improper activities. On limited hangouts, Victor Marchetti writes:

“A ‘limited hangout’ is spy jargon for a favorite and frequently used gimmick of the clandestine professionals.

When their veil of secrecy is shredded and they can no longer rely on a phony cover story to misinform the public, they resort to admitting – sometimes even volunteering – some of the truth while still managing to withhold the key and damaging facts in the case.

The public, however, is usually so intrigued by the new information that it never thinks to pursue the matter further.”

Good old Julian! It sounds like he pissed off a few feminists,
by sleeping with them and then moving on sexually, thus the rape
charges.

No doubt all the new publicity and fame will keep his bed full,
with admiring devotees.

Thus the Wickileaks "Days of our Lives" continues.

One can only be amused

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/assange-anger-at-smear-campaign-after-leaked-police-files-published-in-the-guardian/story-fn775xjq-1225973443379
“Bjorn Hurtig, Assange's Swedish lawyer, said he would lodge a formal complaint to the authorities and ask them to investigate how such sensitive police material leaked into the public domain.”

I’m trying to work out how I feel about that... isn’t the complaint exactly the opposite of what WikiLeaks is supporting?

“They point out that the offence of "minor rape", with which he may be charged, has no equivalent in British law because the accused can be guilty even if a woman consents.”

That bit just out right horrifies me.

Now I am going to go watch Alex.

Should the Official Secrets Act in our country be done away with?

Danielle, no is my response to your query for validated safety reasons of all Australians.