The law has passed and will stay so deal with it, deal with the fact that love is an equal fact for either gender. Results for remembrance supporting the bill, 45 (+3) and against, 36 (+4) - Bates, Bleijie, Choi, Crandon, Cripps, Cunningham, Davis, Dempsey, Dickson, Douglas, Dowling, Elmes, Emerson, Flegg, Foley, Gibson, Hopper, Johnson, Keech, Langbroek, McArdle, McLindon, Messenger, Nicholls, Powell, Pratt, Rickuss, Robinson, Seeney, Simpson, Springborg, Stevens, Stuckey, Wellington. ALSO SECOND READING (Hobbs, Knuth, Malone, Menkens)

A male has as much love for a child as a female that can provide, educate and build rapport with a child to an equal measure.
This goes for surrogacy and same sex parents, the development of a child is a mental state of mind, built from the child’s surroundings and security.

Mclindon “Changing minds half way through”; has anyone to date changed their mind halfway through! he’s forgetting these are couples like any other couple starting a family, not a single young or under aged parent that has made a mistake, nor able to financially support, or bring a child up.

Strength comes from being around people that care, help and support within and around those surroundings, not a simple fact of two parents of opposite sex offering half support each to make the completion of full development in upbringing.

The theme commented on through Dr David van Gend and the Church through campaigns over the years “every child needs a mother and a father” is weak, not to mention an excuse to outline such ideals taught within biblical studies and/or Christian Conferences, that one cannot develop nor succeed in live without such connections.

Dr David van Gend says a “child is being deprived of a mother by the state”, that this “shameful act violates the child’s fundamental right to enter the world as all of us did with at least the possibility of a mum and dad in our lives”. This just outlines his continual motivation through his choice of living via his beliefs that what does not align with his perception is unethical.

Nice rant. What's your point?

Cont..

Dr David van Gend is a family doctor, a University senior lecturer and activist spokesman for Ethical Stem Cell Research living in Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia. He has a wife, three boys, should not only understand but make more use of his independents of thinking rather than dependants of his teachings, that life is not simple and there is a bigger picture with broader vision, that what’s right evolves over time.

This topic is not the only attack such people are campaigning against, there’s new legalisations on improving life happiness and scientific research striving for achievement of new advancements including technologies.

Such topics connected to Dr David van Gend are embryo experimentation, abortions (young mothers), human cloning (human body parts), euthanasia (human rights for choice) and government funding for research that these people feel is not natural in science or life.

A slit percentage of people run on one brainwave stimulated by the fact that what’s natural is what they were brought up with and taught, without further development in that thought process.

Children of Surrogacy will grow and develop naturally, they will still think, look and react the same as anyone with a mother or father, but with more tolerance to broader vision of variations of life.

They will develop with the ability spend more time socially, with the ability to freely express themselves without walls of limitations in vision, ideals or worries about other people’s judgment.

Life and full bodied motion like any species starts with their first breath of air, the moment of awareness of being present in the world and being alive.

Backing onto this subject is same sex parents, a bonus for the community in many ways; a bonus in adoption; a bonus fostering children without homes; a bonus for more families; a bonus in having an opportunity for investment the same way two sex families have towards our economy; a bonus most of all in happiness, that everyone has a right to in life.

Cont..

Dr David van Gend – A reader of Christian literature, forums, blogs and bible studies that attends Christian Conferences on a regular base, as guest speaker against these topics may be a family doctor, but what families is he is a doctor for? is one family different than another or is it just selective choice.

15 Nov 2010 Dr David van Gend asked ‘The legalisation of same-sex marriage’ “is progress?” The answer is YES, it is progress in living in harmony and tolerance as it was prior to Christ, for better understanding, better living for some and for everyone it’s one step closer to that outreach of peace.

Dr David says “Homosexual is not something you are born with”, he is right it is a choice people have the freedom to make, a choice of living the same way everyone has, the right of choice in belief and religion if choosing so.

As demonstrated through evolution with humans and other species, that what you are looking for sometimes is right in-front of you. That the coin of companionship is not always found on the other-side of the river, but with whom you feel most comfortable spending time with.

Brett J Hutton

for a child to grow up emotionally balanced and culturally secure it needs the constant home closeness of both male and female parents as each brings different expressions to an intimate human relationship.

Casual contacts by the gender lacking from the family home distorts the child's view of gender. Two men raising a female child fails to give it in a home environment the natural gender roles, similarly with two females raising a boy. Similarly distortions occurr with children with seperated parents. The example of love of the opposite gender and intimacy in the parents relationship is the best and most secure environment for children as they are the very child of both parents.