Oh dear Fraccy, are you running out of things to do over at Pomerania? Has the thrill of defacing pictures worn off yet? You're such rebels...

The Antiseptic Appreciation Society must be feeling lost, but hasn't the standard of discussion improved here in the real world?

Lexi:”Hiding behind anonymity on this forum does not give the right to people to be offensive, that is basically the message that this thread is trying to relay.”

It is?

I thought we were working out what invited moderation and then there was me wondering where the others had gone and suggesting something about the moderation had resulted in…. [insert Jaws theme]… Cyberia, or more the people who were there than the blog.

Although moderation might have been the end result of an all out spitting match for all I know and the moderation itself not the actual problem, which then bounces back to the rules and how I wanted to know if something had changed or if how the rules were interpreted now had changed from a year ago. Or if I had imagined the whole thing and it was always like this.

“Speculation and guesswork causes a lot of personal damage and injury to individuals, communities, organisations, governments, and in the past people have been sued successfully for damage caused.”

Hmm... What if it isn’t speculation or guesswork just cold hard facts? I think you are still silenced in this country and Lexi there is two different conversations kinda getting intertwined here… which is probably my fault for going to different directions within one message

Piper:

Cold hard facts don't tell the full story. As any historian will tell you there is no such thing as "objective history." For example, the historian can establish that an act took place on a certain day, but this, constitutes only chronology or "factology." The moment the historian begins to look critically at motivation, circumstances, context, or any other such considerations, it becomes unacceptable for one or another camp of readers.

“That would be because she's the only one of that group who ever actually contributed anything. The rest were simply noisemakers and conversation blockers.
Posted by Antiseptic, Thursday, 25 November 2010 6:05:05 AM”

Johnny, that isn’t Anti changing his mind… that is just him back handing the rest of the group.

“Of course you can always review the posting history of those Anti has named and make up your own mind.”

I have tried, mostly keep getting a headache trawling through it only to find posts deleted. I thought someone would just come out and say it but nah just hints and stuff and go look for yourself. There is either nothing to find or something really strange going on.

And can we stop the Foxy is gone farce, I’m glad she’s still here and haven’t spotted the others yet but if that is you Fractelle I missed you lots. Why are you both sneaking around?

Lexi... I keep going to call you Lexis (knew someone of that name once)… but anyhow... It aint that serious and I don’t care mostly how unacceptable it is to historians. Don't tell me cold hard facts.. I want OLO gossip! :P

Pied Piper

I am friends with Severin/Fractelle is all, like her I loathe hypocrites and bullies. People like CJ Morgan, Examinator, Pynche and her are unable to defend themselves from the tripe that has been dumped on them around here. So I try to keep things a little more equitable is all.

I do not know whether Severin will return, she never received an email from the editor about being banned, she read about it here. I think I can say this as part of the topic. Tricky knowing what to say and what not to.

Yeah, reading through histories is time consuming - but you have been around OLO before, you know a bit about the personalities here.

[Deleted for trying to impersonate the moderator and yes, user suspended, under both her identities.]