The Forum > General Discussion > Has Australia stopped being Australia ?
Has Australia stopped being Australia ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
When I was a kid, my mum made an interesting comment that, for some reason, has stuck with me (probably because I found it interesting).
She noted that, while growing up in Rhodesia, there were very few signs telling her what she couldn't do. It was simply accepted (a generalisation, I'm sure) that unless a sign said you COULD do something, you couldn't do it. Thus there was no need for signs saying "no entry" above doorways - unless the sign said "enter here", people stayed away. "Keep off the lawn", "consumption of alcohol strictly prohibited", "Do not touch" - all of these signs were unnecessary.
The interesting part was that she noticed a different mindset in Australia. Not necessarily better or worse - just different. Here, unless there was a sign saying "do not touch", touching was implicitly permitted. An open door without a sign saying "keep out" was an invitation to enter. Now, my mother's observations only apply to the post-1988 world. But they do suggest a certain freedom of spirit in Australia - one that isn't necessarily shared by the rest of the English-speaking world. Maybe Australia HAS changed, and Australians haven't?
Sorry to continue the irrelevant nitpicking, but I'm assuming your friend didn't pass through France on the journey to Spain. In Paris, in the Champagne region, in Provence and on the Cote d'Azur, I could barely take two steps without seeing a police officer.