Pericles you miss the point.How did this this rare and sophistocated substance get into the WTC dust? Ordinary folk do not not have access to military facilities.Who then gave it to these 4 people if you are saying it was a set up.Prof Harrit said that did not have the facilities in Cophenhagen do do it.There was very little known about it when Prof Harrit began his study 3 yrs ago.

There are hundreds of serious anomolies,eye witness accounts,photographic evidence,physics,maths,chemistry etc that prove the official theory a lie. http://ae91truth.org/
The truth is coming out.You are wasting my time.

Obama is gone.Palin and Clinton will follow.There is a big grass roots movement in the USA and parasites like Palin who are in the bankster's pockets, are trying to ride their wave of popularity.People like Ron Paul Denis Kucinich,Judge Napolitano,Alan Grayson,Peter Schiff etc, now have the publics ear.

This is exactly what I meant, Arjay, when I pointed out that "so many assumptions are made, at every stage"

>>Pericles you miss the point.How did this this rare and sophistocated substance get into the WTC dust?<<

First of all, you have assumed that it is, in fact, "WTC dust". This has not been proven, just surmised.

Then you proceed to assume that it contains a "rare and sophistocated [sic] substance". This has not been proven, merely postulated.

So all you have is an unknown substance that appears in dust that may or may not have come from the WTC rubble. What kind of evidence is that?

>>The truth is coming out.You are wasting my time.<<

I should remind you that it is you, Arjay, who keeps repeating the same old tosh, at every opportunity. Who is wasting whose time?

By the way, where did you get the idea that the Bank of England belonged to the Rothschilds? Was that from your loopy professor too? What about the assets that were stripped when the Bank was nationalized? Another of his fantasies?

You really should find less, ...errm... excitable company, Arjay.

It will be better for your nerves. And people might not avoid you quite so much at parties.

Golly Pericles.Do I have to give you a lesson in chemistry as well?Ordinary thermite a combination of Al and Fe O2 can be made at home.It burns rapidly at very high temps.

Nano technology is highly sophistocated since the molecules are mixed almost perfectly to the react explosively and with more heat since there is a quicker exchange of oxygen.It explodes as well as cutting through steel.Prof Harritt said he did not have the facilities to manufacture it in Copenhagen.

This is why they fires raged underground for weeks even though they poured thousands of gallons of water on the rubble.Nano thermite has its own oxygen supply and burns to 2500 dg C. almost twice the melting point of steel(1370 deg C).There are photographic records of molten steel huge gurders cut like some huge oxy torch has parted them.Ordinary fires reach only 700 dg C so how was it possible to have molten steel,and the burning of Al Fe O2 and temps of 2500 C ?

You have not done your homework Pericles.

How can something burn rapidly (i.e. explosively) and slowly (fires underground for several weeks) at the same time?

Explosives do not burn for several weeks Arjay.

There are photos I have seen of girders that looked like they were cut by an oxy torch, but that's actually because they were.

There's absolutely no point, Arjay, in giving me a half-baked lecture on chemical compounds, flammable or otherwise.

As I have already pointed out, there is no sufficiently recognizable chain of evidence that connects the "dust" in question, with the WTC.

Nor is there evidence that the dust contained nano-thermite material. It was inferred, from extremely flimsy premises.

So you can witter on about molten steel as much as you like, but you - along with everyone else - are totally unable to connect the dots.

This is why it is unlikely that there will be yet another enquiry.

In fact, I can think of two very good reasons, straight off the top of my head.

1. There are no grounds, apart from the existence some loony-tunes conspiracy theorists, to ask the taxpayer to incur such an expense. Especially given that every one of those loony-tuners would demand their own airtime, and would scream "conspiracy" if their pathetic little voices were not heard.

2. Whatever the verdict, there would be a bunch of conspiracy-nuts claiming "cover-up" if their own pet theory (CIA/Mossad/Bush/Donald Duck/whatever) were discarded.

By the way, still no response on the Bank? or the Rothschilds? nationalization? What about interest rates and hyperinflation?

You really should think before you write, Arjay.

You are simply building a picture of yourself as someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject at hand, but simply retweets stuff that is fed to them by some nutter or other, or that has been unquestioningly hoovered up from a web site with its trademark multicoloured typeface.

Bugsey,if you studied Prof Harrits work he says that it was not only thermite that was used.Nano thermite can act in two ways ie as an explosive or as a means of cutting steel.Harrit found other chemical residues such as magnesium and sulphur which is used to lower the melting point of steel.He says there is evidence of other explosives being used.We see evidence of cutter charges in the twin towers that slice the major corner structures.So depending on the intensity of the mixture,nano-themite can explode or cut through metal

This is why we need a true and open investigation.The whole puzzle has not been solved.They are not sure how much explosives were used,or in many instances how they were applied.Harrit rules out painting it on,although that could have been done to pulverise the concrete.Harrit said that every second floor wired, would have been sufficient to bring it down in such a fashion.

Just see Danny Jowenko http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3DRhwRN06I the Dutch explosives expert and his opinion of WTC 7 who at this time did not know about this building.He was shown the video of WTC 7 and not told of it's name or origin when he viewed it.He was in no doubt,it was controlled demolition.