Dear Oto

you hit the nail on the head..BANG..well done.

*exactly* what DOES this have to do with 'racial hatred' ? pretty much nothing.

BUT...look at how the police reacted ?

//A police investigation involving no less than four officers from the specialist hate crime unit, plus a civilian member of staff. A string of witnesses. Video evidence.//

From WHICH unit did the police action come ? the...HATE crime unit.

I find it a bit hilarious actually (in sick kind of way)..because both the participants in this were 'colored'...and the police had to choose WHICH one was the easiest target....politically. (that's how I see it) so...they chose the one who probably represents (according to their numbers people) the lower estimate of political liabilty.

It would have been ooooh soooo easy if the 'perpetrator' was 'white'....that would have been a done deal.

My contention is.. that 'hate speech' laws (such as out RRT) are being..or intended to be used as a battering ram against the ramparts of traditional identity whether it be British (white) or Aussie (also white.

Don't get me wrong... the 'white' aspect is purely a coincidence of history..but for most of us it is OUR coincidence and we are connected to it very strongly.

3 pieces of obligatory reading to understand these trends.

1/ http://racetraitor.org/ Notice the cartoon.. (Ignatiev is the man behind the Web site.. former Harvard history professor)

Notice how the dialogue between the 'confused white girl' is suddenly 'healed' with the obvious 'logic, reason and eloquence' of the site authors.. (made me sick)

2/ http://racetraitor.org/abolish.html a piece by that professor on abolishing the white race.

3/ An up to date example of this same thinking in Australia:

http://www.acrawsa.org.au/ "critial whiteness studies"

Now...SEE if you get this :)

If a man shoots another with a shotgun.. would you expect a 'fully suspended sentence' ?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/shootings-flag-new-gang-feud/story-e6frf7jo-1225815573974

I saw these people in court yesterday and the son Omar in the dock.
Note this :) (I watched it all..start to finish..nothing was thrown)
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/05/2945272.htm?site=gippsland

Of course it is politically correct for only “whitey” to be labelled “racist”

For those of us who have seen how Indians and Africans can treat one another with such distain it is simple to see how someone of African origin can call an Asian a “coconut” and how Asians were herded up and expelled from Kenya, Uganda and other parts of Africa as part of a systematic black Pogrom. Similarly the Tamils, in Sri Lanka, have consistently made unreasonable demands for disproportionate political representation from 1930’s on, ultimately sowing the seeds for their own demise with the fall of their terrorist army.

Anyone who thinks, for a minute, that “racism” is a Caucasian only characteristic, needs to wake up to yet another “Inconvenient truth”

Oko, Algore, Stern. What Stern wrote was the sentence I was looking for and........."Anyone who thinks, for a minute, that “racism” is a Caucasian only characteristic, needs to wake up to yet another “Inconvenient truth”

And with that, Stern......Your spot on.

All over the world, humans in general need a greater understanding of not only themselves, but the adjustment for no longer one colour living in one country. Look at the American Africans and Mexicans, Chinese, and so on gangs for a instance, which concludes that turf wars still dictate our old primitive traces of some of the oldest parts of the brain.

Unfortunately the human race goes at one speed, and evolution goes at another. Some where in the centre there will be a common ground in time to come.

I think we are starting to see it.

These two ladies of power should and do know a lot better, and this is clearly solid evidence that white humans have nothing to do with leading racism, like I mentioned, its in us all, in some degree.



TTM>