The Forum > General Discussion > Ok those who think Corporations are sensitive and responsible...
Ok those who think Corporations are sensitive and responsible...
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
Posted by Severin, Saturday, 19 June 2010 9:26:41 AM
| |
To Severin, Yabby, Foxy, Pelican and all the other inhabitants of these
dungeons, I think that you are all arguing in vein. I suggest that you spend 10 or 15 minutes and & read the following link. http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6574 The present recession that the world seems to be having trouble climbing back out of, is not going to change much. We can expect increasing pressure on our standard of living as the price of oil continues to press up against our reluctance or inability to pay more for petrol and food. The cost of energy and the difficulties of transitioning to a different energy regime is going to change the whole economic and political systems to such a degree that your present comments will sound like discussions in the flat earth society. Anyway Gail Tveberg says it much better than I can so go read that link. Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 19 June 2010 12:51:01 PM
| |
*The privatization of these industries have resulted in the loss of choice and redress to the consumer that we have today.*
Pure rubbish, you seem to have a short memory, Severin. When Telstra was a Govt monopoly, they basically screwed us blind without any choice. When Qantas was a Govt monopoly, they did much the same. When I first went on the internet, in 1995, it cost 6$ then 9$ an hour, there was one ISP, that was my only choice. I tried long and hard to get through the wheels of Govt, to suggest that their Govt gorilla was holding us back, as I felt that the internet had the potential to change lives and our world as we know it. They were not interested. Now I pay 1.50$ a day, for an increasing better service and its due to competition. Phone calls to Europe, in those days cost me 2$ a minute and given that most of my export business was done to Europe, phone bills were off the planet, all thanks to a Govt monopoly. The selling of Qantas and the deregulation of airlines, has dramatically changed what used to be litle but the screwing of the consumer, by Govt mandate Posted by Yabby, Saturday, 19 June 2010 2:52:45 PM
| |
"OK those who think Corporations are sensitive and responsible"
No. They are not. "Corporations driven by competition to offer cheaper access usually riddled with trip wires,-and aggressively pushed at the consumer" Noooo......no, that wasn't the subject of this thread. For a moment there I was confused..., then I realised the confusion wasn't mine! Ooohhh the relief! Posted by Ginx, Saturday, 19 June 2010 3:04:12 PM
| |
*I think that you are all arguing in vein.*
Hang on Bazz, we argue for fun! I've read your posts about peak oil before and had a look at the URL. I am simply not a worrywart as you are, for I have learnt to accept that predicting the future usually lands up in failure. For good reasons, some variable comes along which nobody had considered and bang, the whole game changes once again. Is society as we know it going to change dramatically? Sure it will, so what? So the price of oil goes to 300$ a barrel. The first thing we'll all do is start to use it a little more wisely then we now do, for if you look carefully, you will see huge waste going on. But of course if somebody is paying more for oil, somebody else is earning more from oil and highly likely spending it. More resources will be spent on drilling for more expensive oil, the Middle East will have even more money to spend then they now have, it all goes in a circle. Let me give you an example. The price of lamb and mutton is at an all time high right now, despite all the recession talk. The reason is quite simple. Prices were so low for so long, that farmers largely baled out of producing them. Now there is a shortage. But the Middle East don't care, they are simply paying the price, based on all their petrodollars and buying what they need Posted by Yabby, Saturday, 19 June 2010 3:26:41 PM
| |
Thanks for the reply Yabby, always good to hear your opinion.
Yes, Yabby you are right as far as it goes, but it is the timing that will get us undone. It is too late to avoid major problems but our politicians seem to be aware of the problem, but are not game to stand up and tell the majority what is going to happen. They are not prepared to make even the simplest preparations. Obama's speach a couple of days back is the closest any major politician has come to saying it out loud. My comment on the discussion here was the feeling I had of a lot of good comment that was wasted because it was all relevant to a world that will not exist. I am not as pessimistic as perhaps you thought as I believe we can surmount the energy problems, but we need to use the presently available sources to achieve that transition. There are not going to be any magic bullets and we will just have to develop what we have now as alternatives. Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 20 June 2010 9:02:36 AM
|
People can only "vote with their wallets" (I share Unique's abhorrence of this term) where there is choice. Monopolies, by their nature, do not provide competitive choice. They do not need to care for their customers when the customer has no other options. Hence the need for some services to be under government control, such as public transport, essential services (communication, water, power). The privatization of these industries have resulted in the loss of choice and redress to the consumer that we have today.
Awaiting another 'bait' from Yabby.