The Forum > General Discussion > National Service
National Service
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
For a start, you haven't specified what you mean by "National Service". You say that your suggestion isn't restricted to military service, like the last experience Australia had of national service (i.e. conscription to fight a pointless war on behalf of someone else). However, you don't provide any details of what you envisage as 'national service', beyond vague muttering about young people doing unpleasant stuff they dion't want to do.
What sort of work do you have in mind? Have you taken into account that it's probably work that people are already paid to do - and if so, what becomes of them?
What do you mean by "a working background 'expert'" anyway? If you think that academics don't work, you obviously know nothing about their jobs and the conditions under which they work. If you mean uneducated and disgruntled manual workers like yourself, perhaps the lack of any detail for implementing your vague ideas might be a clue as to why they aren't taken up.
Get real, mate. Australia is a much bigger and more complex society than you apparently experience in your daily life - and very, very few Australians would support the reintroduction of 'national service', particularly in the unspecified form that you have so far provided.