The Forum > General Discussion > Double Dissolution election
Double Dissolution election
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You did not under stand it, but it is in use today and both sides like it.
I think they work well, at least it gives some certainty to the business owner about costs.
I was also of the opinion that they were outlawed with the new award.
Are they still being used within the hospitality and retail industries?
If so, why the new penalty rates?
I also agree with SM. Rudd has been presented with a few opportunities to go to the poles, it's just that voters have found out that he is no longer the 'golden boy' he portayed himself to be and, with each passing day, another S-fight that he has resided over rares its ugly head.
Let's face it, there are many stuff ups to choose from, solar, insulation, health, education, fuel watch, grocery watch and boat people and, who can forget Copenhagen. In fact, Rudd and Gilard will be so busy dodging bullets that they won't have time to plan an early election, don't you recon?
Has anyone got any idea just how much this fool has pissed away on failed schemes? Most failures of this magnitude take decades, even generations, this guy has managed to achieve these milestones in little more than two years. And you think he is a legend!
He is S-scared, just hoping for TA to present him with another life line, like the maternity leave proposal, although I doubt that will happen.
I say again, Rudd is a dud! What a pitty he will still be very rich when he is finnished playing PM.