"This country, will NEVER support greens policy's on extreme climate change wants.
Defense, trade, how do I say it without being offensive?"
By actually telling me the specific policies, and explaining where they will fail, and why they fall short of 'the real world'.

King Hazza do you think I come here to do your research for you?
Do your own.
Just maybe start with climate change,you up the thread inferred an ETS was fraud.
Do not look at the greens latest offer alone look at its first reason for not voting for Labors scheme.
You truly must not use such tactics in debate,you show me yours I will show you mine.
I know this, if every voters knew greens policy's on every issue your party would halve it vote this year, and die in ten.

Yes, a 'tactic' of proving that I actually did research by bringing up specific acts/attributes to rebuke inane statements- and insisting others show theirs in the exact same way (or else if not applicable, tell them to do some research in the first place instead of making empty statements- is incredibly effective.

At this point I think I'll probably be able to take my leave, satisfied now with a rebuke for a post involving- in the same paragraph;
-complaining about having to do research to make sure you're actually right
-Saying that "insert unnamed and assumedly unresearched policie(s) are nonetheless SO bad that etc etc" and not mention a single one.

4TH march was it 8.58? King Hazza your post here in reference to ETS, Slapping the greens on the back for voting it down.
Are signs you, not I, do not understand the greens intent on this issue,
Me too however, debating with you is like riding a bicycle without wheels.
Lot of peddling no progress.
If it is just you and me here lets close the door on it.

Indeed- we've both been repeating ourselves to no avail:

You've been repeating the same vague, empty statements with 'you just don't get it' (while being very careful to avoid saying what 'it' is to prove YOU do 'get it', if there's even an 'it').

I've been repeating myself in asking you to substantiate your claims with just one single statement, and coming back empty handed.

I agree- we should wrap it up.

For the benefit of Belly and others - on the 'sustainability' of the Greens:

"Farmers cheer Greens leader"

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/farmers-cheer-greens-leader-20100323-qroi.html