This is my last post to or referring to you TAPP.
Never once walked away from a fight, but I must do so here.
This forum is bigger than you or me.
It deserves better.
I Understand you are lost.
And that your shameful inference unions or the ALP
Hide such filth, not for the first time you infer they may even be involved .
I will not feed your illness, see if you can be man enough to leave me out of your diatribes.
Get well bloke truly get well.

I will post a link for the Heiner affair, so all those here can judge forthemselves.

I will stand by what i say and fight.
I will not stick my head in the sand and hide or imagine it did not happen.

http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/goss/
http://justiceproject.net/content/default.asp

One Law For Us, Another For Them

You cannot have an administration of justice that has to back away from something, either because of the size of it, the cost of it, or the profile of some of the people involved. If you do that , you don't have a community …

West Australian Crown Prosecutor Ron Davies who successfully prosecuted two prominent individuals involved in the Rothwells Bank collapse.

On 5 March 1990, the Queensland State Cabinet authorised the destruction of all evidence taken by an inquiry into a State-run youth detention centre (for some inmates it was a prison, for others, a controlled environment).

The documents involved were all shredded 18 days later.

At the time Cabinet made its decision it was aware that the documents were being sought by a firm of lawyers for legal action. The responsible department had been advised via no less than 13 separate communications that the documents were required by the lawyers (and even advised that the material should not be destroyed). A District Court action was specifically mentioned and indeed there were, potentially, four different kinds of actions that might have been pursued by those seeking access to the documents.

According to one former Minister, at the time the decision was made to destroy the material, Cabinet had been aware "in broad terms" that the documents contained information about child abuse, and because the matter had reached the level of Cabinet, the matters must have been serious.

Indeed we now know they were serious and included, at least, information about the orchestrated pack-rape of a 14-year-old girl in care* and the torture of a 15- year-old girl.