http://www.infowars.com/agenda-21-alert-public-private-partnerships/

Public-Private Partnerships..are one of the most effective tools that are used by the globalists to implement Agenda 21 Sustainable Development,..

..with the goal of destroying the structure of governments that represent the people,..and puts profits and resources in the hands of the private interest collectivists.

The public part of the Public-Private Partnership..(PPP)..is the government,..which becomes corrupted..and no longer represents the taxpayers, when it accepts funding from private interests.

Further, the government becomes silent..against abuses to the public when they have been compromised..by PPP business arrangements,..and, worse yet,..may also sell off resources and utilities that were owned by the taxpayers.

The government does this because they are broke..and more taxation is unpopular.

The private part of the PPP..is often a combination of these entities:

- Corporations..(usually multinational)

- Foundations..(like Rockefeller)

- Associations

- Universities

- Any entity with a lot of money

- Non-Governmental Agencies..(NGO’s)...NGO’s are usually environmental agencies,..like the Sierra Club and the Nature Conservancy.

The private stakeholder in the business arrangement always has profit as its goal,..not service...Service was formerly the role of the representative government.

The assets that once belonged to the taxpayers are then transferred to private interests, in a transfer of wealth through the assets,..to private parties that seek profit at any price.

Frequently,..deceit.. deception and distortion are used..to fleece the taxpayer into this..’solution’/for governments that are broke.

local,..county,..state and the federal governments have gone broke and are ripe for the sale of their assets to PPP’s because of deficit spending, and a lack of economic common sense.

John Maynard Keynes promoted deficit spending to Roosevelt as a way to escape the Depression...This results in diluted government and loss of power.

Ms. Veon reports that the only way to combat this is:

1. Being alert..and recognizing this scam

2. Understanding..the structure and intent of the PPP

3. Taking action by exposing..the PPP deceit at government meetings

For a wealth of information on PPP’s and other related topics,..visit Joan Veon’s website at www.womensgroup.org.

digiwigi: "Forrest - I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 and don't have the minor problem you mentioned."

Your sympathy is wasted on Forrest. He was running 7.01 until recently, then he upgrades to 8?!? He is trapped in some digital time wrap of his own making, I think.

There is a distribution that moves at Forrest's pace. Debian. It is more suited to Forrest in other ways, too. Although it is slow, it is sure - it has fewer bugs on release than Ubuntu. Which is hardly surprising considering they take at least a year to do a release. Yes, Debian and Forrest would make a good fit, I think.

im getting error messages
seems my disk is full
and despite deleting masses of my info.

im simply not able to get rid of the mess-age
seems they want me to empty my whole computer

on the strength of this mess-age...
that wants me to delete all my files

well stuff you ...i will take the error message as a con...typical of these times...when your trying to control us having info...and restricting our ability to hold on to..the info we allready got

you sought first..to empty my email...next...it was my...info..next its me..well fuc you ...flash your info mess-age all you like...im sick of deleting...info....get it..

Internet censorship plan gets the green light in AU
(SMH)
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/internet-censorship-plan-gets-the-green-light-20091215-ktzc.html

The Federal Government has announced it will proceed with controversial plans to censor the internet after Government-commissioned trials found filtering a blacklist of banned sites was accurate and would not slow down the internet.

But critics, including the online users’ lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia and the Greens communications spokesman Scott Ludlam, said the trial results were not surprising and the policy was still fundamentally flawed.

The Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, said today he would introduce legislation just before next year’s elections to force ISPs to block a blacklist of “refused classification” (RC) websites for all Australian internet users.

The blacklist, featuring material such as child sex abuse, sexual violence and instructions on crime, would be compiled using a public complaints mechanism, Government censors and URLs provided by international agencies.

Senator Conroy also released results from a pilot trial of ISP-level internet filters, conducted by Enex Testlab, which he said found that blocking banned material “can be done with 100 per cent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speed”.

“Most Australians acknowledge that there is some internet material which is not acceptable in any civilised society,” he said.

“It is important that all Australians, particularly young children, are protected from this material.”

He said about 15 western countries had encouraged or enforced internet filtering, and there was no reason why Australians should not have similar protection.

It is not clear how – or if – the filters will distinguish between illegal RC material and that which is perfectly legal to view.

An earlier version of the Government’s top-secret list of banned sites was leaked on to the web in March, revealing the scope of the filtering could extend significantly beyond child porn.

About half of the sites on the list were not related to child porn and included a slew of online poker sites, YouTube links, regular gay and straight porn sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions such as satanic sites, fetish sites, Christian sites, the website of a tour operator and even a Queensland dentist.

“Given the pilot’s modest goals, it was designed from the beginning to pass,” said EFA spokesman Colin Jacobs.

“Although it may address some technical issues, what it leaves out is far more important – exactly what will be blocked, who will decide, and why is it being attempted in the first place?”

Similarly, Senator Ludlam said: “Nobody said that filtering from a static list of URLs was going to slow things down too much unless the list gets huge, so I don’t think they’ve already proven anything that we don’t already know.”

The pilot trial report also noted that motivated people could circumvent any internet filters with ease, which Senator Ludlam and Jacobs said called the effectiveness of the proposal into question.

Ludlam said proving a technical case was not the same as proving the wisdom of going down the internet censorship track in the first place, which he said had always been two separate discussions.

“While the Government says that they will be relying on an evidence-based policy, we still haven’t seen evidence that this is going to play any meaningful role in preventing children from accessing harmful material online,” Senator Ludlam said.

Jacobs said: “Successful technology isn’t necessarily successful policy. We’re still yet to hear a sensible explanation of what this policy is for, who it will help and why it is worth spending so much taxpayer money on.”

Peter Coroneos, chief executive of the Internet Industry Association, said he would be meeting with his members tonight to discuss the report before formulating a response.

Senator Conroy said the Government would immediately undertake public consultations, starting today with the release of a discussion paper on additional measures to improve the accountability and transparency of processes that lead to sites being placed on the blacklist.

Some of the options raised include appeal mechanisms, notification to website owners of RC content and the review by an independent expert.